mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-05 06:26:55 +07:00
x86/fpu: Rename sanitize_i387_state() to fpstate_sanitize_xstate()
So the sanitize_i387_state() function has the following purpose: on CPUs that support optimized xstate saving instructions, an FPU fpstate might end up having partially uninitialized data. This function initializes that data. Note that the function name is a misnomer and confusing on two levels, not only is it not i387 specific at all, but it is the exact opposite: it only matters on xstate CPUs. So rename sanitize_i387_state() and __sanitize_i387_state() to fpstate_sanitize_xstate() and __fpstate_sanitize_xstate(), to clearly express the purpose and usage of the function. We'll further clean up this function in the next patch. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
befc61ad3c
commit
d090319312
@ -139,13 +139,13 @@ static inline void fx_finit(struct i387_fxsave_struct *fx)
|
||||
fx->mxcsr = MXCSR_DEFAULT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extern void __sanitize_i387_state(struct task_struct *);
|
||||
extern void __fpstate_sanitize_xstate(struct task_struct *);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void sanitize_i387_state(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
static inline void fpstate_sanitize_xstate(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!use_xsaveopt())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
__sanitize_i387_state(tsk);
|
||||
__fpstate_sanitize_xstate(tsk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define user_insn(insn, output, input...) \
|
||||
|
@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ int xfpregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
|
||||
fpu__activate_stopped(fpu);
|
||||
sanitize_i387_state(target);
|
||||
fpstate_sanitize_xstate(target);
|
||||
|
||||
return user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
|
||||
&fpu->state.fxsave, 0, -1);
|
||||
@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ int xfpregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
|
||||
fpu__activate_stopped(fpu);
|
||||
sanitize_i387_state(target);
|
||||
fpstate_sanitize_xstate(target);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
|
||||
&fpu->state.fxsave, 0, -1);
|
||||
@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ int fpregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
|
||||
&fpu->state.fsave, 0,
|
||||
-1);
|
||||
|
||||
sanitize_i387_state(target);
|
||||
fpstate_sanitize_xstate(target);
|
||||
|
||||
if (kbuf && pos == 0 && count == sizeof(env)) {
|
||||
convert_from_fxsr(kbuf, target);
|
||||
@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ int fpregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
|
||||
|
||||
fpu__activate_stopped(fpu);
|
||||
|
||||
sanitize_i387_state(target);
|
||||
fpstate_sanitize_xstate(target);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU))
|
||||
return fpregs_soft_set(target, regset, pos, count, kbuf, ubuf);
|
||||
|
@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_has_xfeatures);
|
||||
* if the corresponding header bit is zero. This is to ensure that user-space doesn't
|
||||
* see some stale state in the memory layout during signal handling, debugging etc.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void __sanitize_i387_state(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
void __fpstate_sanitize_xstate(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct i387_fxsave_struct *fx = &tsk->thread.fpu.state.fxsave;
|
||||
int feature_bit;
|
||||
@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ int save_xstate_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx, int size)
|
||||
if (ia32_fxstate)
|
||||
fpu_fxsave(&tsk->thread.fpu);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
sanitize_i387_state(tsk);
|
||||
fpstate_sanitize_xstate(tsk);
|
||||
if (__copy_to_user(buf_fx, xsave, xstate_size))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user