AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git synced 2024-11-24 02:40:52 +07:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest outcomes wrt unreachable code

Browse Source 
commit 973377ffe8148180b2651825b92ae91988141b05 upstream

In almost all cases from test_verifier that have been changed in here, we've
had an unreachable path with a load from a register which has an invalid
address on purpose. This was basically to make sure that we never walk this
path and to have the verifier complain if it would otherwise. Change it to
match on the right error for unprivileged given we now test these paths
under speculative execution.

There's one case where we match on exact # of insns_processed. Due to the
extra path, this will of course mismatch on unprivileged. Thus, restrict the
test->insn_processed check to privileged-only.

In one other case, we result in a 'pointer comparison prohibited' error. This
is similarly due to verifying an 'invalid' branch where we end up with a value
pointer on one side of the comparison.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Borkmann 2021-08-04 20:09:16 +03:00 committed by AuxXxilium
parent e99e07a4d8
commit ce3fdf6ae6
8 changed files with 53 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
View File

@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
}
}
if (test->insn_processed) {
if (!unpriv && test->insn_processed) {
uint32_t insn_processed;
char *proc;

2
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c
View File

@ -61,6 +61,8 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 0
},

14
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
View File

@ -508,6 +508,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT
},
{
@ -528,6 +530,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT
},
{
@ -569,6 +573,8 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
},
@ -589,6 +595,8 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
},
@ -609,6 +617,8 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
},
@ -674,6 +684,8 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
},
@ -695,6 +707,8 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
},

2
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c
View File

@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_0, 10, -4),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 7,
},

22
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c
View File

@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@ -150,6 +152,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@ -213,6 +217,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@ -280,6 +286,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@ -348,6 +356,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@ -416,6 +426,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@ -484,6 +496,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@ -552,6 +566,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@ -620,6 +636,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@ -688,6 +706,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@ -756,6 +776,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},

10
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c
View File

@ -82,8 +82,8 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
.retval_unpriv = 1,
.result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.retval = 1,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
@ -141,7 +141,8 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
.result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@ -162,6 +163,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
.result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},

2
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c
View File

@ -419,6 +419,8 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R7 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 0,
},

7
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
View File

@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars",
.errstr_unpriv = "R2 pointer comparison prohibited",
.retval = 0,
},
{
@ -159,7 +159,8 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
// fake-dead code; targeted from branch A to
// prevent dead code sanitization
// prevent dead code sanitization, rejected
// via branch B however
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@ -167,7 +168,7 @@
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars",
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.retval = 0,
},
{