mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-05 21:26:39 +07:00
md: use resync_max_sectors for reshape as well as resync.
Some resync type operations need to act on the address space of the device, others on the address space of the array. This only affects RAID10, so it sets resync_max_sectors to the array size (it defaults to the device size), and that is currently used for resync only. However reshape of a RAID10 must be done against the array size, not device size, so change code to use resync_max_sectors for both the resync and the reshape cases. This does not affect RAID5 or RAID1, just RAID10. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1fdd6fc92f
commit
c804cdecea
@ -4425,7 +4425,8 @@ sync_completed_show(struct mddev *mddev, char *page)
|
||||
if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery))
|
||||
return sprintf(page, "none\n");
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery))
|
||||
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery) ||
|
||||
test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery))
|
||||
max_sectors = mddev->resync_max_sectors;
|
||||
else
|
||||
max_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
|
||||
@ -6803,7 +6804,8 @@ static void status_resync(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev * mddev)
|
||||
|
||||
resync = mddev->curr_resync - atomic_read(&mddev->recovery_active);
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery))
|
||||
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery) ||
|
||||
test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery))
|
||||
max_sectors = mddev->resync_max_sectors;
|
||||
else
|
||||
max_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
|
||||
@ -7366,7 +7368,7 @@ void md_do_sync(struct mddev *mddev)
|
||||
j = mddev->recovery_cp;
|
||||
|
||||
} else if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery))
|
||||
max_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
|
||||
max_sectors = mddev->resync_max_sectors;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
/* recovery follows the physical size of devices */
|
||||
max_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user