mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 21:20:50 +07:00
bonding: fix locking in enslave failure path
In commit 3c5913b53f
("bonding:
primary_slave & curr_active_slave are not cleaned on enslave failure")
I didn't account for the use of curr_active_slave without curr_slave_lock
and since there are such users, we should hold bond->lock for writing while
setting it to NULL (in the NULL case we don't need the curr_slave_lock).
Keeping the bond lock as to avoid the extra release/acquire cycle.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ecf01c22be
commit
c6cdcf6d82
@ -1915,14 +1915,16 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
|
||||
bond_detach_slave(bond, new_slave);
|
||||
if (bond->primary_slave == new_slave)
|
||||
bond->primary_slave = NULL;
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
|
||||
if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) {
|
||||
bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
|
||||
read_lock(&bond->lock);
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
|
||||
bond_select_active_slave(bond);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
slave_disable_netpoll(new_slave);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user