mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-01-24 02:39:46 +07:00
gianfar: Fix P1010 config regression (SQ polling)
The P1010 device tree restricts the number of supported interrupt groups to 1, although the eth controller can support 2 interrupt groups and the driver assumes the Multi-Group mode ("fsl,etsec2" model). So, in this case the assumption that the Multi-Group mode (MQ_MG_MODE) devices always support 2 interrupt groups is false. To fix this, a check for the actual number of interrupt groups enabled in the board's device tree has been added in gfar_probe for the "fsl,etsec2" devices. Without this fix, P1010 based boards claim support for 2 Tx queues to the net stack but only one is actually allocated, leading to NULL access in xmit. This issue was introduced by enabling Single-Queue polling for the P1010 devices. (71ff9e3
gianfar: Use Single-Queue polling for "fsl,etsec2") Fixes:71ff9e3df7
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a4eb21fd6
commit
c65d753372
@ -754,9 +754,19 @@ static int gfar_of_init(struct platform_device *ofdev, struct net_device **pdev)
|
||||
num_tx_qs = 1;
|
||||
num_rx_qs = 1;
|
||||
} else { /* MQ_MG_MODE */
|
||||
/* get the actual number of supported groups */
|
||||
unsigned int num_grps = of_get_available_child_count(np);
|
||||
|
||||
if (num_grps == 0 || num_grps > MAXGROUPS) {
|
||||
dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "Invalid # of int groups(%d)\n",
|
||||
num_grps);
|
||||
pr_err("Cannot do alloc_etherdev, aborting\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (poll_mode == GFAR_SQ_POLLING) {
|
||||
num_tx_qs = 2; /* one txq per int group */
|
||||
num_rx_qs = 2; /* one rxq per int group */
|
||||
num_tx_qs = num_grps; /* one txq per int group */
|
||||
num_rx_qs = num_grps; /* one rxq per int group */
|
||||
} else { /* GFAR_MQ_POLLING */
|
||||
num_tx_qs = tx_queues ? *tx_queues : 1;
|
||||
num_rx_qs = rx_queues ? *rx_queues : 1;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user