mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-14 16:06:41 +07:00
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code
The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a188339ca5
commit
c2af88f1a0
@ -278,19 +278,25 @@ static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
|
||||
sram_base_addr = of_iomap(node, 0);
|
||||
if (!sram_base_addr) {
|
||||
pr_err("%s: could not map sram registers\n", __func__);
|
||||
of_node_put(node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (has_pmu && rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu())
|
||||
if (has_pmu && rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu()) {
|
||||
of_node_put(node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
|
||||
if (rockchip_smp_prepare_sram(node))
|
||||
if (rockchip_smp_prepare_sram(node)) {
|
||||
of_node_put(node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* enable the SCU power domain */
|
||||
pmu_set_power_domain(PMU_PWRDN_SCU, true);
|
||||
|
||||
of_node_put(node);
|
||||
node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-scu");
|
||||
if (!node) {
|
||||
pr_err("%s: missing scu\n", __func__);
|
||||
@ -300,6 +306,7 @@ static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
|
||||
scu_base_addr = of_iomap(node, 0);
|
||||
if (!scu_base_addr) {
|
||||
pr_err("%s: could not map scu registers\n", __func__);
|
||||
of_node_put(node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -318,6 +325,7 @@ static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
|
||||
asm ("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2\n" : "=r" (l2ctlr));
|
||||
ncores = ((l2ctlr >> 24) & 0x3) + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
of_node_put(node);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure that all cores except the first are really off */
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < ncores; i++)
|
||||
|
@ -266,12 +266,14 @@ static int __init rk3288_suspend_init(struct device_node *np)
|
||||
rk3288_bootram_base = of_iomap(sram_np, 0);
|
||||
if (!rk3288_bootram_base) {
|
||||
pr_err("%s: could not map bootram base\n", __func__);
|
||||
of_node_put(sram_np);
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = of_address_to_resource(sram_np, 0, &res);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
pr_err("%s: could not get bootram phy addr\n", __func__);
|
||||
of_node_put(sram_np);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
rk3288_bootram_phy = res.start;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user