mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 11:20:49 +07:00
vfs: Call ->sync_fs() even if s_dirt is 0 (version 4)
sync_filesystems() has a condition that if wait == 0 and s_dirt == 0, then ->sync_fs() isn't called. This does not really make much sence since s_dirt is generally used by a filesystem to mean that ->write_super() needs to be called. But ->sync_fs() does different things. I even suspect that some filesystems (btrfs?) sets s_dirt just to fool this logic. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a3e5cb8e0
commit
bfe881255c
@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ void sync_filesystems(int wait)
|
||||
sb->s_count++;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
|
||||
down_read(&sb->s_umount);
|
||||
if (sb->s_root && (wait || sb->s_dirt))
|
||||
if (sb->s_root)
|
||||
sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, wait);
|
||||
up_read(&sb->s_umount);
|
||||
/* restart only when sb is no longer on the list */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user