mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 07:30:54 +07:00
[MTD] Define and use MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN instead of 0xffffffff
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0e8c47c58
commit
bb0eb217c9
@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int concat_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = 0xffffffff;
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
|
||||
/* make a local copy of instr to avoid modifying the caller's struct */
|
||||
erase = kmalloc(sizeof (struct erase_info), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static int concat_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
|
||||
/* sanity check: should never happen since
|
||||
* block alignment has been checked above */
|
||||
BUG_ON(err == -EINVAL);
|
||||
if (erase->fail_addr != 0xffffffff)
|
||||
if (erase->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = erase->fail_addr + offset;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int part_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
|
||||
instr->addr += part->offset;
|
||||
ret = part->master->erase(part->master, instr);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
if (instr->fail_addr != 0xffffffff)
|
||||
if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
|
||||
instr->addr -= part->offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ void mtd_erase_callback(struct erase_info *instr)
|
||||
if (instr->mtd->erase == part_erase) {
|
||||
struct mtd_part *part = PART(instr->mtd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (instr->fail_addr != 0xffffffff)
|
||||
if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
|
||||
instr->addr -= part->offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2042,7 +2042,7 @@ int nand_erase_nand(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr,
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = 0xffffffff;
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Grab the lock and see if the device is available */
|
||||
nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_ERASING);
|
||||
|
@ -1794,7 +1794,7 @@ static int onenand_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = 0xffffffff;
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Grab the lock and see if the device is available */
|
||||
onenand_get_device(mtd, FL_ERASING);
|
||||
|
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static void jffs2_erase_block(struct jffs2_sb_info *c,
|
||||
instr->len = c->sector_size;
|
||||
instr->callback = jffs2_erase_callback;
|
||||
instr->priv = (unsigned long)(&instr[1]);
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = 0xffffffff;
|
||||
instr->fail_addr = MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
|
||||
((struct erase_priv_struct *)instr->priv)->jeb = jeb;
|
||||
((struct erase_priv_struct *)instr->priv)->c = c;
|
||||
@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void jffs2_erase_failed(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_eraseblock
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* For NAND, if the failure did not occur at the device level for a
|
||||
specific physical page, don't bother updating the bad block table. */
|
||||
if (jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c) && (bad_offset != 0xffffffff)) {
|
||||
if (jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c) && (bad_offset != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)) {
|
||||
/* We had a device-level failure to erase. Let's see if we've
|
||||
failed too many times. */
|
||||
if (!jffs2_write_nand_badblock(c, jeb, bad_offset)) {
|
||||
|
@ -25,8 +25,10 @@
|
||||
#define MTD_ERASE_DONE 0x08
|
||||
#define MTD_ERASE_FAILED 0x10
|
||||
|
||||
#define MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN 0xffffffff
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the erase fails, fail_addr might indicate exactly which block failed. If
|
||||
fail_addr = 0xffffffff, the failure was not at the device level or was not
|
||||
fail_addr = MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN, the failure was not at the device level or was not
|
||||
specific to any particular block. */
|
||||
struct erase_info {
|
||||
struct mtd_info *mtd;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user