mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-01-23 03:00:04 +07:00
percpu-refcount: use RCU-sched insted of normal RCU
percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8
("percpu-refcount:
consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU") fixed it by converting the
preepmtion operations with rcu_read_[un]lock() citing that there isn't
any advantage in using sched-RCU over using the usual one; however,
rcu_read_[un]lock() for the preemptible RCU implementation -
CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, chosen when CONFIG_PREEMPT - are slightly
more expensive than preempt_disable/enable().
In a contrived microbench which repeats the followings,
- percpu_ref_get()
- copy 32 bytes of data into percpu buffer
- percpu_put_get()
- copy 32 bytes of data into percpu buffer
rcu_read_[un]lock() used in percpu_ref_get/put() makes it go slower by
about 15% when compared to using sched-RCU.
As the RCU critical sections are extremely short, using sched-RCU
shouldn't have any latency implications. Convert to RCU-sched.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dbece3a0f1
commit
a4244454df
@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_get(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned __percpu *pcpu_count;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
rcu_read_lock_sched();
|
||||
|
||||
pcpu_count = ACCESS_ONCE(ref->pcpu_count);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_get(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
else
|
||||
atomic_inc(&ref->count);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
unsigned __percpu *pcpu_count;
|
||||
int ret = false;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
rcu_read_lock_sched();
|
||||
|
||||
pcpu_count = ACCESS_ONCE(ref->pcpu_count);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
ret = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_put(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned __percpu *pcpu_count;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
rcu_read_lock_sched();
|
||||
|
||||
pcpu_count = ACCESS_ONCE(ref->pcpu_count);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_put(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
else if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(&ref->count)))
|
||||
ref->release(ref);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -154,5 +154,5 @@ void percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(struct percpu_ref *ref,
|
||||
(((unsigned long) ref->pcpu_count)|PCPU_REF_DEAD);
|
||||
ref->confirm_kill = confirm_kill;
|
||||
|
||||
call_rcu(&ref->rcu, percpu_ref_kill_rcu);
|
||||
call_rcu_sched(&ref->rcu, percpu_ref_kill_rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user