mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-18 00:06:39 +07:00
raid5: call clear_batch_ready before set STRIPE_ACTIVE
We tried to only put the head sh of batch list to handle_list, then the
handle_stripe doesn't handle other members in the batch list. However,
we still got the calltrace in break_stripe_batch_list.
[593764.644269] stripe state: 2003
kernel: [593764.644299] ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel: [593764.644308] WARNING: CPU: 12 PID: 856 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4625 break_stripe_batch_list+0x203/0x240 [raid456]
[...]
kernel: [593764.644363] Call Trace:
kernel: [593764.644370] handle_stripe+0x907/0x20c0 [raid456]
kernel: [593764.644376] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x89/0xc0
kernel: [593764.644379] handle_active_stripes.isra.57+0x35f/0x570 [raid456]
kernel: [593764.644382] ? raid5_wakeup_stripe_thread+0x96/0x1f0 [raid456]
kernel: [593764.644385] raid5d+0x480/0x6a0 [raid456]
kernel: [593764.644390] ? md_thread+0x11f/0x160
kernel: [593764.644392] md_thread+0x11f/0x160
kernel: [593764.644394] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
kernel: [593764.644396] kthread+0xfc/0x130
kernel: [593764.644398] ? find_pers+0x70/0x70
kernel: [593764.644399] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
kernel: [593764.644401] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
As we can see, the stripe was set with STRIPE_ACTIVE and STRIPE_HANDLE,
and only handle_stripe could set those flags then return. And since the
stipe was already in the batch list, we need to return earlier before
set the two flags.
And after dig a little about git history especially commit 3664847d95
("md/raid5: fix a race condition in stripe batch"), it seems the batched
stipe still could be handled by handle_stipe, then handle_stipe needs to
return earlier if clear_batch_ready to return true.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
38ffc01f38
commit
a377a472b9
@ -4682,6 +4682,16 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
|
||||
struct r5dev *pdev, *qdev;
|
||||
|
||||
clear_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* handle_stripe should not continue handle the batched stripe, only
|
||||
* the head of batch list or lone stripe can continue. Otherwise we
|
||||
* could see break_stripe_batch_list warns about the STRIPE_ACTIVE
|
||||
* is set for the batched stripe.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (clear_batch_ready(sh))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_and_set_bit_lock(STRIPE_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) {
|
||||
/* already being handled, ensure it gets handled
|
||||
* again when current action finishes */
|
||||
@ -4689,11 +4699,6 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (clear_batch_ready(sh) ) {
|
||||
clear_bit_unlock(STRIPE_ACTIVE, &sh->state);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_ERR, &sh->state))
|
||||
break_stripe_batch_list(sh, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user