mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-14 17:57:05 +07:00
arm64: dts: hisilicon: Standardize Poplar GPIO line names
The hi6220-HiKey board started to name GPIO lines for 96boards, using just the plain names "GPIO-A" etc from the 96boards specification. Poplar started to use an arbitrary "LS-GPIO-A" (etc) prefix that is not part of the 96boards specification. As the former notation arrived first, and we need consistency among 96board, rectify the Poplar board to use this too. This is important for userspace that wants to look up GPIO names from these strings. Cc: Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@hisilicon.com> Cc: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
63fc36cdcb
commit
a1fb73d7da
@ -78,17 +78,17 @@ eth_phy1: phy@3 {
|
||||
|
||||
&gpio1 {
|
||||
status = "okay";
|
||||
gpio-line-names = "LS-GPIO-E", "",
|
||||
gpio-line-names = "GPIO-E", "",
|
||||
"", "",
|
||||
"", "LS-GPIO-F",
|
||||
"", "LS-GPIO-J";
|
||||
"", "GPIO-F",
|
||||
"", "GPIO-J";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
&gpio2 {
|
||||
status = "okay";
|
||||
gpio-line-names = "LS-GPIO-H", "LS-GPIO-I",
|
||||
"LS-GPIO-L", "LS-GPIO-G",
|
||||
"LS-GPIO-K", "",
|
||||
gpio-line-names = "GPIO-H", "GPIO-I",
|
||||
"GPIO-L", "GPIO-G",
|
||||
"GPIO-K", "",
|
||||
"", "";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -96,15 +96,15 @@ &gpio3 {
|
||||
status = "okay";
|
||||
gpio-line-names = "", "",
|
||||
"", "",
|
||||
"LS-GPIO-C", "",
|
||||
"", "LS-GPIO-B";
|
||||
"GPIO-C", "",
|
||||
"", "GPIO-B";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
&gpio4 {
|
||||
status = "okay";
|
||||
gpio-line-names = "", "",
|
||||
"", "",
|
||||
"", "LS-GPIO-D",
|
||||
"", "GPIO-D",
|
||||
"", "";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ &gpio5 {
|
||||
status = "okay";
|
||||
gpio-line-names = "", "USER-LED-1",
|
||||
"USER-LED-2", "",
|
||||
"", "LS-GPIO-A",
|
||||
"", "GPIO-A",
|
||||
"", "";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user