mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-01-19 08:27:39 +07:00
Merge branch 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 microcode updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes are a fix early microcode application for resume-from-RAM, plus a 32-bit initrd placement fix - by Borislav Petkov" * 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/microcode: Make a couple of symbols static x86/microcode/intel: Save pointer to ucode patch for early AP loading x86/microcode: Look for the initrd at the correct address on 32-bit
This commit is contained in:
commit
9bc088ab66
@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static bool get_builtin_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp, unsigned int family)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void __load_ucode_amd(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax, struct cpio_data *ret)
|
||||
static void __load_ucode_amd(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax, struct cpio_data *ret)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
|
||||
struct cpio_data cp;
|
||||
|
@ -290,6 +290,17 @@ struct cpio_data find_microcode_in_initrd(const char *path, bool use_pa)
|
||||
return (struct cpio_data){ NULL, 0, "" };
|
||||
if (initrd_start)
|
||||
start = initrd_start;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The picture with physical addresses is a bit different: we
|
||||
* need to get the *physical* address to which the ramdisk was
|
||||
* relocated, i.e., relocated_ramdisk (not initrd_start) and
|
||||
* since we're running from physical addresses, we need to access
|
||||
* relocated_ramdisk through its *physical* address too.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
u64 *rr = (u64 *)__pa_nodebug(&relocated_ramdisk);
|
||||
if (*rr)
|
||||
start = *rr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return find_cpio_data(path, (void *)start, size, NULL);
|
||||
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
|
||||
static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
|
||||
|
||||
/* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
|
||||
struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
|
||||
static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool cpu_signatures_match(unsigned int s1, unsigned int p1,
|
||||
unsigned int s2, unsigned int p2)
|
||||
@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static struct ucode_patch *__alloc_microcode_buf(void *data, unsigned int size)
|
||||
static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct microcode_header_intel *mc_hdr, *mc_saved_hdr;
|
||||
struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p;
|
||||
struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p = NULL;
|
||||
bool prev_found = false;
|
||||
unsigned int sig, pf;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -202,6 +202,18 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
|
||||
else
|
||||
list_add_tail(&p->plist, µcode_cache);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Save for early loading. On 32-bit, that needs to be a physical
|
||||
* address as the APs are running from physical addresses, before
|
||||
* paging has been enabled.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (p) {
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
|
||||
intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p->data);
|
||||
else
|
||||
intel_ucode_patch = p->data;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
|
||||
@ -607,6 +619,14 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
|
||||
struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
|
||||
struct cpio_data cp;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* initrd is going away, clear patch ptr. We will scan the microcode one
|
||||
* last time before jettisoning and save a patch, if found. Then we will
|
||||
* update that pointer too, with a stable patch address to use when
|
||||
* resuming the cores.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!load_builtin_intel_microcode(&cp))
|
||||
cp = find_microcode_in_initrd(ucode_path, false);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -619,9 +639,6 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
|
||||
|
||||
show_saved_mc();
|
||||
|
||||
/* initrd is going away, clear patch ptr. */
|
||||
intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user