mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-25 01:50:53 +07:00
[NET] ifb: set separate lockdep classes for queue locks
[ 10.536424] ======================================================= [ 10.536424] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 10.536424] 2.6.25-rc3-devel #3 [ 10.536424] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 10.536424] swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock: [ 10.536424] (&dev->queue_lock){-+..}, at: [<c0299b4a>] dev_queue_xmit+0x175/0x2f3 [ 10.536424] [ 10.536424] but task is already holding lock: [ 10.536424] (&p->tcfc_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8a67154>] tcf_mirred+0x20/0x178 [act_mirred] [ 10.536424] [ 10.536424] which lock already depends on the new lock. lockdep warns of locking order while using ifb with sch_ingress and act_mirred: ingress_lock, tcfc_lock, queue_lock (usually queue_lock is at the beginning). This patch is only to tell lockdep that ifb is a different device (e.g. from eth) and has its own pair of queue locks. (This warning is a false-positive in common scenario of using ifb; yet there are possible situations, when this order could be dangerous; lockdep should warn in such a case.) (With suggestions by David S. Miller) Reported-and-tested-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
38fe999e22
commit
94833dfb8c
@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
|
||||
#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
|
||||
#include <net/net_namespace.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#define TX_TIMEOUT (2*HZ)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -227,6 +228,16 @@ static struct rtnl_link_ops ifb_link_ops __read_mostly = {
|
||||
module_param(numifbs, int, 0);
|
||||
MODULE_PARM_DESC(numifbs, "Number of ifb devices");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* dev_ifb->queue_lock is usually taken after dev->ingress_lock,
|
||||
* reversely to e.g. qdisc_lock_tree(). It should be safe until
|
||||
* ifb doesn't take dev->queue_lock with dev_ifb->ingress_lock.
|
||||
* But lockdep should know that ifb has different locks from dev.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct lock_class_key ifb_queue_lock_key;
|
||||
static struct lock_class_key ifb_ingress_lock_key;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init ifb_init_one(int index)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct net_device *dev_ifb;
|
||||
@ -246,6 +257,10 @@ static int __init ifb_init_one(int index)
|
||||
err = register_netdevice(dev_ifb);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_set_class(&dev_ifb->queue_lock, &ifb_queue_lock_key);
|
||||
lockdep_set_class(&dev_ifb->ingress_lock, &ifb_ingress_lock_key);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
err:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user