mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-23 00:06:51 +07:00
drm/i915/selftests: Flush interrupts before disabling tasklets
When setting up the system to perform the atomic reset, we need to serialise with any ongoing interrupt tasklet or else: <0> [472.951428] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527056us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 11659:2, current 0 <0> [472.951554] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527059us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes <0> [472.951681] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527061us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 11659:2, 0:0 } <0> [472.951805] i915_sel-4442 0.... 466527114us : __igt_atomic_reset_engine: i915_reset_engine(rcs0:active) under hardirq <0> [472.951932] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527115us : intel_engine_reset: rcs0 flags=11d <0> [472.952056] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527117us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0: depth<-1 <0> [472.952179] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527119us : intel_engine_stop_cs: rcs0 <0> [472.952305] <idle>-0 1..s1 466527119us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=3, tail=4 <0> [472.952431] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527122us : __intel_gt_reset: engine_mask=1 <0> [472.952557] <idle>-0 1..s1 466527124us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000 <0> [472.952683] <idle>-0 1..s1 466527130us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 11659:2*, 0:0 } <0> [472.952808] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527131us : execlists_reset: rcs0 <0> [472.952933] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527133us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=3, tail=4 <0> [472.953059] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527134us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000 <0> [472.953185] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527136us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 11659:2*, 0:0 } <0> [472.953310] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527150us : assert_pending_valid: Nothing pending for promotion! <0> [472.953436] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527158us : process_csb: process_csb:1930 GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_pending_valid(execlists, "promote")) We have the same CSB events being seen by process_csb() on two different processors. One being issued by the reset in the test, the other by the interrupt; this scenario is supposed to be prevented by flushing the interrupt tasklet with tasklet_disable() before we enter the atomic reset. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112069 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023232443.17450-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
8eb8e322ec
commit
93100fdeb4
@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ static int __igt_atomic_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
|
||||
GEM_TRACE("i915_reset_engine(%s:%s) under %s\n",
|
||||
engine->name, mode, p->name);
|
||||
|
||||
tasklet_disable_nosync(t);
|
||||
tasklet_disable(t);
|
||||
p->critical_section_begin();
|
||||
|
||||
err = intel_engine_reset(engine, NULL);
|
||||
|
@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int igt_atomic_engine_reset(void *arg)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
|
||||
tasklet_disable_nosync(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
|
||||
tasklet_disable(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
|
||||
intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
|
||||
|
||||
for (p = igt_atomic_phases; p->name; p++) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user