mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 01:40:53 +07:00
namei: fold should_follow_link() with the step into not-followed link
All callers are followed by the same boilerplate - "if it has returned 0, update nd->path/inode/seq - we are not following a symlink here". Pull it into the function itself, renaming it into step_into(). Rename WALK_GET to WALK_FOLLOW, while we are at it - more descriptive name. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
31d66bcd3f
commit
8f64fb1cce
48
fs/namei.c
48
fs/namei.c
@ -1725,7 +1725,7 @@ static int pick_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link,
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
enum {WALK_GET = 1, WALK_MORE = 2};
|
||||
enum {WALK_FOLLOW = 1, WALK_MORE = 2};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Do we need to follow links? We _really_ want to be able
|
||||
@ -1733,22 +1733,25 @@ enum {WALK_GET = 1, WALK_MORE = 2};
|
||||
* so we keep a cache of "no, this doesn't need follow_link"
|
||||
* for the common case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int should_follow_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link,
|
||||
int flags,
|
||||
struct inode *inode, unsigned seq)
|
||||
static inline int step_into(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
|
||||
int flags, struct inode *inode, unsigned seq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!(flags & WALK_MORE) && nd->depth)
|
||||
put_link(nd);
|
||||
if (likely(!d_is_symlink(link->dentry)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (!(flags & WALK_GET) && !(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW))
|
||||
if (likely(!d_is_symlink(path->dentry)) ||
|
||||
!(flags & WALK_FOLLOW || nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW)) {
|
||||
/* not a symlink or should not follow */
|
||||
path_to_nameidata(path, nd);
|
||||
nd->inode = inode;
|
||||
nd->seq = seq;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* make sure that d_is_symlink above matches inode */
|
||||
if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
|
||||
if (read_seqcount_retry(&link->dentry->d_seq, seq))
|
||||
if (read_seqcount_retry(&path->dentry->d_seq, seq))
|
||||
return -ECHILD;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return pick_link(nd, link, inode, seq);
|
||||
return pick_link(nd, path, inode, seq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int flags)
|
||||
@ -1791,13 +1794,7 @@ static int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int flags)
|
||||
inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = should_follow_link(nd, &path, flags, inode, seq);
|
||||
if (unlikely(err))
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
|
||||
nd->inode = inode;
|
||||
nd->seq = seq;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return step_into(nd, &path, flags, inode, seq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -2104,10 +2101,10 @@ static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
if (!name)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/* last component of nested symlink */
|
||||
err = walk_component(nd, WALK_GET);
|
||||
err = walk_component(nd, WALK_FOLLOW);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* not the last component */
|
||||
err = walk_component(nd, WALK_GET | WALK_MORE);
|
||||
err = walk_component(nd, WALK_FOLLOW | WALK_MORE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
@ -2617,12 +2614,7 @@ mountpoint_last(struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
path.mnt = nd->path.mnt;
|
||||
error = should_follow_link(nd, &path, 0,
|
||||
d_backing_inode(path.dentry), 0);
|
||||
if (unlikely(error))
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return step_into(nd, &path, 0, d_backing_inode(path.dentry), 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -3311,15 +3303,11 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
|
||||
seq = 0; /* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
|
||||
inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
|
||||
finish_lookup:
|
||||
error = should_follow_link(nd, &path, 0, inode, seq);
|
||||
error = step_into(nd, &path, 0, inode, seq);
|
||||
if (unlikely(error))
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
|
||||
path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
|
||||
nd->inode = inode;
|
||||
nd->seq = seq;
|
||||
/* Why this, you ask? _Now_ we might have grown LOOKUP_JUMPED... */
|
||||
finish_open:
|
||||
/* Why this, you ask? _Now_ we might have grown LOOKUP_JUMPED... */
|
||||
error = complete_walk(nd);
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user