mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 10:10:54 +07:00
ext4: remove i_mutex lock in ext4_evict_inode to fix lockdep complaining
The i_mutex lock and flush_completed_IO() added by commit2581fdc810
in ext4_evict_inode() causes lockdep complaining about potential deadlock in several places. In most/all of these LOCKDEP complaints it looks like it's a false positive, since many of the potential circular locking cases can't take place by the time the ext4_evict_inode() is called; but since at the very least it may mask real problems, we need to address this. This change removes the flush_completed_IO() and i_mutex lock in ext4_evict_inode(). Instead, we take a different approach to resolve the software lockup that commit2581fdc810
intends to fix. Rather than having ext4-dio-unwritten thread wait for grabing the i_mutex lock of an inode, we use mutex_trylock() instead, and simply requeue the work item if we fail to grab the inode's i_mutex lock. This should speed up work queue processing in general and also prevents the following deadlock scenario: During page fault, shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait() that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock. Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fcb8ce5cfe
commit
8c0bec2151
@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ struct mpage_da_data {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN 0x0001
|
||||
#define EXT4_IO_END_ERROR 0x0002
|
||||
#define EXT4_IO_END_QUEUED 0x0004
|
||||
|
||||
struct ext4_io_page {
|
||||
struct page *p_page;
|
||||
|
@ -121,9 +121,6 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
|
||||
trace_ext4_evict_inode(inode);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
|
||||
ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
|
||||
ext4_ioend_wait(inode);
|
||||
|
||||
if (inode->i_nlink) {
|
||||
|
@ -142,7 +142,23 @@ static void ext4_end_io_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
|
||||
if (!mutex_trylock(&inode->i_mutex)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Requeue the work instead of waiting so that the work
|
||||
* items queued after this can be processed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
queue_work(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq, &io->work);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* To prevent the ext4-dio-unwritten thread from keeping
|
||||
* requeueing end_io requests and occupying cpu for too long,
|
||||
* yield the cpu if it sees an end_io request that has already
|
||||
* been requeued.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_QUEUED)
|
||||
yield();
|
||||
io->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_QUEUED;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = ext4_end_io_nolock(io);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user