mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-25 06:00:53 +07:00
drm: Use u64 for intermediate dotclock calculations
We have reached the era where monitor bandwidths now exceed 31bits in frequency calculations, though as we stored them in kHz units we are safe from overflow in the modelines for some time. [ 48.723720] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ../drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c:325:49 [ 48.726943] signed integer overflow: [ 48.728503] 2240 * 1000000 cannot be represented in type 'int' Reported-by: Martin Liška <marxin.liska@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98372 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161021141540.26837-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
93ca7e0066
commit
8a5bbf327a
@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ struct drm_display_mode *drm_cvt_mode(struct drm_device *dev, int hdisplay,
|
||||
unsigned int vfieldrate, hperiod;
|
||||
int hdisplay_rnd, hmargin, vdisplay_rnd, vmargin, vsync;
|
||||
int interlace;
|
||||
u64 tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
/* allocate the drm_display_mode structure. If failure, we will
|
||||
* return directly
|
||||
@ -322,8 +323,11 @@ struct drm_display_mode *drm_cvt_mode(struct drm_device *dev, int hdisplay,
|
||||
drm_mode->vsync_end = drm_mode->vsync_start + vsync;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* 15/13. Find pixel clock frequency (kHz for xf86) */
|
||||
drm_mode->clock = drm_mode->htotal * HV_FACTOR * 1000 / hperiod;
|
||||
drm_mode->clock -= drm_mode->clock % CVT_CLOCK_STEP;
|
||||
tmp = drm_mode->htotal; /* perform intermediate calcs in u64 */
|
||||
tmp *= HV_FACTOR * 1000;
|
||||
do_div(tmp, hperiod);
|
||||
tmp -= drm_mode->clock % CVT_CLOCK_STEP;
|
||||
drm_mode->clock = tmp;
|
||||
/* 18/16. Find actual vertical frame frequency */
|
||||
/* ignore - just set the mode flag for interlaced */
|
||||
if (interlaced) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user