mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-04 02:06:43 +07:00
fs: dcache reduce prune_one_dentry locking
prune_one_dentry can avoid quite a bit of locking in the common case where ancestors have an elevated refcount. Alternatively, we could have gone the other way and made fewer trylocks in the case where d_count goes to zero, but is probably less common. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a734eb458a
commit
89e6054836
27
fs/dcache.c
27
fs/dcache.c
@ -582,26 +582,29 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
|
||||
* Prune ancestors.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (dentry) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&dcache_inode_lock);
|
||||
again:
|
||||
relock:
|
||||
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
if (dentry->d_count > 1) {
|
||||
dentry->d_count--;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!spin_trylock(&dcache_inode_lock)) {
|
||||
relock2:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
goto relock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
|
||||
parent = NULL;
|
||||
else
|
||||
parent = dentry->d_parent;
|
||||
if (parent && !spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
|
||||
goto relock2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dentry->d_count--;
|
||||
if (dentry->d_count) {
|
||||
if (parent)
|
||||
spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
|
||||
__d_drop(dentry);
|
||||
dentry = d_kill(dentry, parent);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user