From 85f4896123d0299128f2c95cc40f3b8b01d4b0f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maarten Lankhorst Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:13:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mutex: Fix w/w mutex deadlock injection The check needs to be for > 1, because ctx->acquired is already incremented. This will prevent ww_mutex_lock_slow from returning -EDEADLK and not locking the mutex. It caused a lot of false gpu lockups on radeon with CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH=y because a function that shouldn't be able to return -EDEADLK did. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51F775B5.201@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/mutex.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c index ff05f4bd86eb..a52ee7bb830d 100644 --- a/kernel/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/mutex.c @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx) might_sleep(); ret = __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx); - if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 0) + if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1) return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx); return ret; @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx) ret = __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx); - if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 0) + if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1) return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx); return ret;