mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-11 21:56:43 +07:00
drm/i915/sdvo: Fix up debug output to not split lines
It leads to a big mess when stuff interleaves. Especially with the new patch I've submitted for the drm core to no longer artificially split up debug messages. v2: The size parameter to snprintf includes the terminating 0, but the return value does not. Adjust the logic accordingly. Spotted by Mika. Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5bc0e85cc6
commit
84fcb46977
@ -413,23 +413,34 @@ static const struct _sdvo_cmd_name {
|
||||
static void intel_sdvo_debug_write(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
|
||||
const void *args, int args_len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
int i, pos = 0;
|
||||
#define BUF_LEN 256
|
||||
char buffer[BUF_LEN];
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: W: %02X ",
|
||||
SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo), cmd);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < args_len; i++)
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("%02X ", ((u8 *)args)[i]);
|
||||
for (; i < 8; i++)
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS(" ");
|
||||
#define BUF_PRINT(args...) \
|
||||
pos += snprintf(buffer + pos, max_t(int, BUF_LEN - pos, 0), args)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < args_len; i++) {
|
||||
BUF_PRINT("%02X ", ((u8 *)args)[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (; i < 8; i++) {
|
||||
BUF_PRINT(" ");
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sdvo_cmd_names); i++) {
|
||||
if (cmd == sdvo_cmd_names[i].cmd) {
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("(%s)", sdvo_cmd_names[i].name);
|
||||
BUF_PRINT("(%s)", sdvo_cmd_names[i].name);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(sdvo_cmd_names))
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("(%02X)", cmd);
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("\n");
|
||||
if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(sdvo_cmd_names)) {
|
||||
BUF_PRINT("(%02X)", cmd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BUG_ON(pos >= BUF_LEN - 1);
|
||||
#undef BUF_PRINT
|
||||
#undef BUF_LEN
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: W: %02X %s\n", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo), cmd, buffer);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const char *cmd_status_names[] = {
|
||||
@ -512,9 +523,10 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_read_response(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
|
||||
{
|
||||
u8 retry = 15; /* 5 quick checks, followed by 10 long checks */
|
||||
u8 status;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
int i, pos = 0;
|
||||
#define BUF_LEN 256
|
||||
char buffer[BUF_LEN];
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: R: ", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The documentation states that all commands will be
|
||||
@ -551,10 +563,13 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_read_response(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
|
||||
goto log_fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define BUF_PRINT(args...) \
|
||||
pos += snprintf(buffer + pos, max_t(int, BUF_LEN - pos, 0), args)
|
||||
|
||||
if (status <= SDVO_CMD_STATUS_SCALING_NOT_SUPP)
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("(%s)", cmd_status_names[status]);
|
||||
BUF_PRINT("(%s)", cmd_status_names[status]);
|
||||
else
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("(??? %d)", status);
|
||||
BUF_PRINT("(??? %d)", status);
|
||||
|
||||
if (status != SDVO_CMD_STATUS_SUCCESS)
|
||||
goto log_fail;
|
||||
@ -565,13 +580,17 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_read_response(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
|
||||
SDVO_I2C_RETURN_0 + i,
|
||||
&((u8 *)response)[i]))
|
||||
goto log_fail;
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS(" %02X", ((u8 *)response)[i]);
|
||||
BUF_PRINT(" %02X", ((u8 *)response)[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("\n");
|
||||
BUG_ON(pos >= BUF_LEN - 1);
|
||||
#undef BUF_PRINT
|
||||
#undef BUF_LEN
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: R: %s\n", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo), buffer);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
log_fail:
|
||||
DRM_LOG_KMS("... failed\n");
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: R: ... failed\n", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo));
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user