mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 14:51:00 +07:00
netpoll: Drop budget parameter from NAPI polling call hierarchy
For some reason we were carrying the budget value around between the various calls to napi->poll. If for example one of the drivers called had a bug in which it returned a non-zero value for work this could result in the budget value becoming negative. Rather than carry around a value of budget that is 0 or less we can instead just loop through and pass 0 to each napi->poll call. If any driver returns a value for work done that is non-zero then we can report that driver and continue rather than allowing a bad actor to make the budget value negative and pass that negative value to napi->poll. Note, the only actual change here is that instead of letting budget become negative we are keeping it at 0 regardless of the value returned for work since it should not be possible for the polling routine to do any actual work with a budget of 0. So if the polling routine returns a non-0 value we are just reporting it and continuing with a budget of 0 rather than letting that work value be subtracted from the budget of 0. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2594e9064a
commit
822d54b9c2
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void queue_process(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
* case. Further, we test the poll_owner to avoid recursion on UP
|
||||
* systems where the lock doesn't exist.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int poll_one_napi(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
static void poll_one_napi(struct napi_struct *napi)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int work = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -149,33 +149,33 @@ static int poll_one_napi(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
* holding the napi->poll_lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state))
|
||||
return budget;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we set this bit but see that it has already been set,
|
||||
* that indicates that napi has been disabled and we need
|
||||
* to abort this operation
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &napi->state))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
work = napi->poll(napi, budget);
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(work > budget, "%pF exceeded budget in poll\n", napi->poll);
|
||||
/* We explicilty pass the polling call a budget of 0 to
|
||||
* indicate that we are clearing the Tx path only.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
work = napi->poll(napi, 0);
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(work, "%pF exceeded budget in poll\n", napi->poll);
|
||||
trace_napi_poll(napi);
|
||||
|
||||
clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &napi->state);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
return budget - work;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev, int budget)
|
||||
static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct napi_struct *napi;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
|
||||
if (napi->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
|
||||
spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)) {
|
||||
budget = poll_one_napi(napi, budget);
|
||||
poll_one_napi(napi);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&napi->poll_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void netpoll_poll_dev(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct net_device_ops *ops;
|
||||
struct netpoll_info *ni = rcu_dereference_bh(dev->npinfo);
|
||||
int budget = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Don't do any rx activity if the dev_lock mutex is held
|
||||
* the dev_open/close paths use this to block netpoll activity
|
||||
@ -208,7 +207,7 @@ static void netpoll_poll_dev(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
/* Process pending work on NIC */
|
||||
ops->ndo_poll_controller(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
poll_napi(dev, budget);
|
||||
poll_napi(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
up(&ni->dev_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user