mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 14:20:55 +07:00
audit: Make testing for a valid loginuid explicit.
audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing
with EINVAL because of a regression caused by e1760bd
.
Apparently some userland audit rule sets want to know if loginuid uid
has been set and are using a test for auid != 4294967295 to determine
that.
In practice that is a horrible way to ask if a value has been set,
because it relies on subtle implementation details and will break
every time the uid implementation in the kernel changes.
So add a clean way to test if the audit loginuid has been set, and
silently convert the old idiom to the cleaner and more comprehensible
new idiom.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.7
Reported-By: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Tested-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b24a30a730
commit
780a7654ce
@ -391,6 +391,11 @@ static inline void audit_ptrace(struct task_struct *t)
|
||||
#define audit_signals 0
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL */
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool audit_loginuid_set(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return uid_valid(audit_get_loginuid(tsk));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT
|
||||
/* These are defined in audit.c */
|
||||
/* Public API */
|
||||
|
@ -246,6 +246,7 @@
|
||||
#define AUDIT_OBJ_TYPE 21
|
||||
#define AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_LOW 22
|
||||
#define AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_HIGH 23
|
||||
#define AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET 24
|
||||
|
||||
/* These are ONLY useful when checking
|
||||
* at syscall exit time (AUDIT_AT_EXIT). */
|
||||
|
@ -365,7 +365,10 @@ static int audit_field_valid(struct audit_entry *entry, struct audit_field *f)
|
||||
case AUDIT_DIR:
|
||||
case AUDIT_FILTERKEY:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* arch is only allowed to be = or != */
|
||||
case AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET:
|
||||
if ((f->val != 0) && (f->val != 1))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
/* FALL THROUGH */
|
||||
case AUDIT_ARCH:
|
||||
if (f->op != Audit_not_equal && f->op != Audit_equal)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
@ -419,17 +422,23 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,
|
||||
f->lsm_str = NULL;
|
||||
f->lsm_rule = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Support legacy tests for a valid loginuid */
|
||||
if ((f->type == AUDIT_LOGINUID) && (f->val == 4294967295)) {
|
||||
f->type = AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET;
|
||||
f->val = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = audit_field_valid(entry, f);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
goto exit_free;
|
||||
|
||||
err = -EINVAL;
|
||||
switch (f->type) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_LOGINUID:
|
||||
case AUDIT_UID:
|
||||
case AUDIT_EUID:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUID:
|
||||
case AUDIT_FSUID:
|
||||
case AUDIT_LOGINUID:
|
||||
case AUDIT_OBJ_UID:
|
||||
f->uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), f->val);
|
||||
if (!uid_valid(f->uid))
|
||||
@ -1222,6 +1231,10 @@ static int audit_filter_user_rules(struct audit_krule *rule, int type,
|
||||
result = audit_uid_comparator(audit_get_loginuid(current),
|
||||
f->op, f->uid);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET:
|
||||
result = audit_comparator(audit_loginuid_set(current),
|
||||
f->op, f->val);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_MSGTYPE:
|
||||
result = audit_comparator(type, f->op, f->val);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -613,6 +613,9 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
|
||||
if (ctx)
|
||||
result = audit_uid_comparator(tsk->loginuid, f->op, f->uid);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET:
|
||||
result = audit_comparator(audit_loginuid_set(tsk), f->op, f->val);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE:
|
||||
@ -1970,7 +1973,7 @@ int audit_set_loginuid(kuid_t loginuid)
|
||||
unsigned int sessionid;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_LOGINUID_IMMUTABLE
|
||||
if (uid_valid(task->loginuid))
|
||||
if (audit_loginuid_set(task))
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
#else /* CONFIG_AUDIT_LOGINUID_IMMUTABLE */
|
||||
if (!capable(CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user