mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-28 11:18:45 +07:00
net/mlx5: Tide up state_lock and vport enabled flag usage
When eswitch is disabled, vport event handler is unregistered. This unregistration already synchronizes with running EQ event handler in below code flow. mlx5_eswitch_disable() mlx5_eswitch_event_handlers_unregister() mlx5_eq_notifier_unregister() atomic_notifier_chain_unregister() synchronize_rcu() notifier_callchain eswitch_vport_event() queue_work() Additionally vport->enabled flag is set under state_lock during esw_enable_vport() but is not read under state_lock in (a) esw_disable_vport() and (b) under atomic context eswitch_vport_event(). It is also necessary to synchronize with already scheduled vport event. This is already achieved using below sequence. mlx5_eswitch_event_handlers_unregister() [..] flush_workqueue() Hence, (a) Remove vport->enabled check in eswitch_vport_event() which doesn't make any sense. (b) Remove redundant flush_workqueue() on every vport disable. (c) Keep esw_disable_vport() symmetric with esw_enable_vport() for state_lock. Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Vu Pham <vuhuong@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
853b53520c
commit
77b094305b
@ -1750,18 +1750,16 @@ static void esw_disable_vport(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
{
|
||||
u16 vport_num = vport->vport;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&esw->state_lock);
|
||||
if (!vport->enabled)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
|
||||
esw_debug(esw->dev, "Disabling vport(%d)\n", vport_num);
|
||||
/* Mark this vport as disabled to discard new events */
|
||||
vport->enabled = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait for current already scheduled events to complete */
|
||||
flush_workqueue(esw->work_queue);
|
||||
/* Disable events from this vport */
|
||||
arm_vport_context_events_cmd(esw->dev, vport->vport, 0);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&esw->state_lock);
|
||||
/* We don't assume VFs will cleanup after themselves.
|
||||
* Calling vport change handler while vport is disabled will cleanup
|
||||
* the vport resources.
|
||||
@ -1780,6 +1778,8 @@ static void esw_disable_vport(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
esw_legacy_vport_destroy_drop_counters(vport);
|
||||
}
|
||||
esw->enabled_vports--;
|
||||
|
||||
done:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&esw->state_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1793,12 +1793,8 @@ static int eswitch_vport_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
|
||||
|
||||
vport_num = be16_to_cpu(eqe->data.vport_change.vport_num);
|
||||
vport = mlx5_eswitch_get_vport(esw, vport_num);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(vport))
|
||||
return NOTIFY_OK;
|
||||
|
||||
if (vport->enabled)
|
||||
if (!IS_ERR(vport))
|
||||
queue_work(esw->work_queue, &vport->vport_change_handler);
|
||||
|
||||
return NOTIFY_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user