mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-03-02 01:34:44 +07:00
net: sctp: sctp_verify_init: clean up mandatory checks and add comment
Add a comment related to RFC4960 explaning why we do not check for initial TSN, and while at it, remove yoda notation checks and clean up code from checks of mandatory conditions. That's probably just really minor, but makes reviewing easier. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
95bd09eb27
commit
7613f5fe11
@ -2240,25 +2240,23 @@ int sctp_verify_init(struct net *net, const struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
struct sctp_chunk **errp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
union sctp_params param;
|
||||
int has_cookie = 0;
|
||||
bool has_cookie = false;
|
||||
int result;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Verify stream values are non-zero. */
|
||||
if ((0 == peer_init->init_hdr.num_outbound_streams) ||
|
||||
(0 == peer_init->init_hdr.num_inbound_streams) ||
|
||||
(0 == peer_init->init_hdr.init_tag) ||
|
||||
(SCTP_DEFAULT_MINWINDOW > ntohl(peer_init->init_hdr.a_rwnd))) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for missing mandatory parameters. Note: Initial TSN is
|
||||
* also mandatory, but is not checked here since the valid range
|
||||
* is 0..2**32-1. RFC4960, section 3.3.3.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (peer_init->init_hdr.num_outbound_streams == 0 ||
|
||||
peer_init->init_hdr.num_inbound_streams == 0 ||
|
||||
peer_init->init_hdr.init_tag == 0 ||
|
||||
ntohl(peer_init->init_hdr.a_rwnd) < SCTP_DEFAULT_MINWINDOW)
|
||||
return sctp_process_inv_mandatory(asoc, chunk, errp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for missing mandatory parameters. */
|
||||
sctp_walk_params(param, peer_init, init_hdr.params) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (SCTP_PARAM_STATE_COOKIE == param.p->type)
|
||||
has_cookie = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
} /* for (loop through all parameters) */
|
||||
if (param.p->type == SCTP_PARAM_STATE_COOKIE)
|
||||
has_cookie = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* There is a possibility that a parameter length was bad and
|
||||
* in that case we would have stoped walking the parameters.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user