mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-21 03:33:07 +07:00
staging: comedi: plx9080.h: correct LRNG_IO_MASK and LMAP_IO_MASK
For the PLX local address space range registers, LAS0RR and LAS1RR, bit 0 indicates whether the local address space will be mapped to memory space or I/O space. If mapped to I/O space, bit 1 must be set to 0, and bits 31 to 2 form the address decoding mask, which should be -2^N mod 2^32 for a range of length 2^N. The `LRNG_IO_MASK` macro is supposed to specify the address decoding bits for I/O space. It currently has the value `0xfffffffa`, but should be `0xfffffffc`, or possibly `0xfffffffe` (it doesn't really matter, since bit 1 is required to be set to 0). Change it to `0xfffffffc`. Similarly, for the PLX local address space local base address (remap) registers, LAS0BA and LAS1BA, bits 31 to 2, masked with the corresponding "range" register form the local base address for the local address space. The `LMAP_IO_MASK` macro is supposed to mask the valid bits for I/O space. Change its value from `0xfffffffa` to `0xfffffffc` to match `LRNG_IO_MASK`. Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cda2315000
commit
66906590ca
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ struct plx_dma_desc {
|
||||
/* bits that specify range for memory io */
|
||||
#define LRNG_MEM_MASK 0xfffffff0
|
||||
/* bits that specify range for normal io */
|
||||
#define LRNG_IO_MASK 0xfffffffa
|
||||
#define LRNG_IO_MASK 0xfffffffc
|
||||
/* L, Local Addr Space 0 Remap Register */
|
||||
#define PLX_LAS0MAP_REG 0x0004
|
||||
/* L, Local Addr Space 1 Remap Register */
|
||||
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct plx_dma_desc {
|
||||
/* bits that specify decode for memory io */
|
||||
#define LMAP_MEM_MASK 0xfffffff0
|
||||
/* bits that specify decode bits for normal io */
|
||||
#define LMAP_IO_MASK 0xfffffffa
|
||||
#define LMAP_IO_MASK 0xfffffffc
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Mode/Arbitration Register.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user