mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 04:40:51 +07:00
workqueue: use "pool->cpu < 0" to stand for an unbound pool
There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool(). The meaning of this code is "if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain and return" IIUC. But the code uses "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED" imprecisely due to a non-unbound pool may also have this flags. We should use "pool->cpu < 0" to stand for an unbound pool, so we covert the code to it. There is no strictly wrong if we still keep "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED" here, but it is just a noise if we keep it: 1) we focus on "unbound" here, not "[dis]association". 2) "pool->cpu < 0" already implies "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED". Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ebe06187bf
commit
61d0fbb4b6
@ -3457,7 +3457,7 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* sanity checks */
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)) ||
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(!(pool->cpu < 0)) ||
|
||||
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pool->worklist)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user