mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-25 00:40:56 +07:00
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt: convert it to ReST markup
- use ReST markups for section headers; - add cross-references to the options; - mark code blocks; - a few minor changes to make Sphinx happy. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Jonathan Corbet
parent
44f9d45e38
commit
5fe270a47e
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
Everything you ever wanted to know about Linux -stable releases.
|
||||
Everything you ever wanted to know about Linux -stable releases
|
||||
===============================================================
|
||||
|
||||
Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
|
||||
"-stable" tree:
|
||||
@ -27,7 +28,8 @@ Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
|
||||
- It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:
|
||||
Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
- If the patch covers files in net/ or drivers/net please follow netdev stable
|
||||
submission guidelines as described in
|
||||
@ -35,56 +37,78 @@ Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:
|
||||
- Security patches should not be handled (solely) by the -stable review
|
||||
process but should follow the procedures in Documentation/SecurityBugs.
|
||||
|
||||
For all other submissions, choose one of the following procedures:
|
||||
For all other submissions, choose one of the following procedures
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
--- Option 1 ---
|
||||
.. _option_1:
|
||||
|
||||
Option 1
|
||||
********
|
||||
|
||||
To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: none
|
||||
|
||||
To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag
|
||||
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to
|
||||
the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author
|
||||
or subsystem maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
--- Option 2 ---
|
||||
in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to
|
||||
the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author
|
||||
or subsystem maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
After the patch has been merged to Linus' tree, send an email to
|
||||
stable@vger.kernel.org containing the subject of the patch, the commit ID,
|
||||
why you think it should be applied, and what kernel version you wish it to
|
||||
be applied to.
|
||||
.. _option_2:
|
||||
|
||||
--- Option 3 ---
|
||||
Option 2
|
||||
********
|
||||
|
||||
Send the patch, after verifying that it follows the above rules, to
|
||||
stable@vger.kernel.org. You must note the upstream commit ID in the
|
||||
changelog of your submission, as well as the kernel version you wish
|
||||
it to be applied to.
|
||||
After the patch has been merged to Linus' tree, send an email to
|
||||
stable@vger.kernel.org containing the subject of the patch, the commit ID,
|
||||
why you think it should be applied, and what kernel version you wish it to
|
||||
be applied to.
|
||||
|
||||
Option 1 is *strongly* preferred, is the easiest and most common. Options 2 and
|
||||
3 are more useful if the patch isn't deemed worthy at the time it is applied to
|
||||
a public git tree (for instance, because it deserves more regression testing
|
||||
first). Option 3 is especially useful if the patch needs some special handling
|
||||
to apply to an older kernel (e.g., if API's have changed in the meantime).
|
||||
.. _option_3:
|
||||
|
||||
Note that for Option 3, if the patch deviates from the original upstream patch
|
||||
(for example because it had to be backported) this must be very clearly
|
||||
documented and justified in the patch description.
|
||||
Option 3
|
||||
********
|
||||
|
||||
Send the patch, after verifying that it follows the above rules, to
|
||||
stable@vger.kernel.org. You must note the upstream commit ID in the
|
||||
changelog of your submission, as well as the kernel version you wish
|
||||
it to be applied to.
|
||||
|
||||
:ref:`option_1` is **strongly** preferred, is the easiest and most common.
|
||||
:ref:`option_2` and :ref:`option_3` are more useful if the patch isn't deemed
|
||||
worthy at the time it is applied to a public git tree (for instance, because
|
||||
it deserves more regression testing first). :ref:`option_3` is especially
|
||||
useful if the patch needs some special handling to apply to an older kernel
|
||||
(e.g., if API's have changed in the meantime).
|
||||
|
||||
Note that for :ref:`option_3`, if the patch deviates from the original
|
||||
upstream patch (for example because it had to be backported) this must be very
|
||||
clearly documented and justified in the patch description.
|
||||
|
||||
The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit
|
||||
text, like this:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: none
|
||||
|
||||
commit <sha1> upstream.
|
||||
|
||||
Additionally, some patches submitted via Option 1 may have additional patch
|
||||
prerequisites which can be cherry-picked. This can be specified in the following
|
||||
format in the sign-off area:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: none
|
||||
|
||||
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: a1f84a3: sched: Check for idle
|
||||
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: 1b9508f: sched: Rate-limit newidle
|
||||
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: fd21073: sched: Fix affinity logic
|
||||
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
||||
|
||||
The tag sequence has the meaning of:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: none
|
||||
|
||||
The tag sequence has the meaning of:
|
||||
git cherry-pick a1f84a3
|
||||
git cherry-pick 1b9508f
|
||||
git cherry-pick fd21073
|
||||
@ -93,12 +117,17 @@ format in the sign-off area:
|
||||
Also, some patches may have kernel version prerequisites. This can be
|
||||
specified in the following format in the sign-off area:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: none
|
||||
|
||||
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x-
|
||||
|
||||
The tag has the meaning of:
|
||||
The tag has the meaning of:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: none
|
||||
|
||||
git cherry-pick <this commit>
|
||||
|
||||
For each "-stable" tree starting with the specified version.
|
||||
For each "-stable" tree starting with the specified version.
|
||||
|
||||
Following the submission:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -109,7 +138,8 @@ Following the submission:
|
||||
other developers and by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Review cycle:
|
||||
Review cycle
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
- When the -stable maintainers decide for a review cycle, the patches will be
|
||||
sent to the review committee, and the maintainer of the affected area of
|
||||
@ -125,17 +155,22 @@ Review cycle:
|
||||
security kernel team, and not go through the normal review cycle.
|
||||
Contact the kernel security team for more details on this procedure.
|
||||
|
||||
Trees:
|
||||
Trees
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
- The queues of patches, for both completed versions and in progress
|
||||
versions can be found at:
|
||||
|
||||
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git
|
||||
|
||||
- The finalized and tagged releases of all stable kernels can be found
|
||||
in separate branches per version at:
|
||||
|
||||
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Review committee:
|
||||
Review committee
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
- This is made up of a number of kernel developers who have volunteered for
|
||||
this task, and a few that haven't.
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user