mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 04:40:51 +07:00
nexthop: Bounce NHA_GATEWAY in FDB nexthop groups
[ Upstream commit b19218b27f3477316d296e8bcf4446aaf017aa69 ]
The function nh_check_attr_group() is called to validate nexthop groups.
The intention of that code seems to have been to bounce all attributes
above NHA_GROUP_TYPE except for NHA_FDB. However instead it bounces all
these attributes except when NHA_FDB attribute is present--then it accepts
them.
NHA_FDB validation that takes place before, in rtm_to_nh_config(), already
bounces NHA_OIF, NHA_BLACKHOLE, NHA_ENCAP and NHA_ENCAP_TYPE. Yet further
back, NHA_GROUPS and NHA_MASTER are bounced unconditionally.
But that still leaves NHA_GATEWAY as an attribute that would be accepted in
FDB nexthop groups (with no meaning), so long as it keeps the address
family as unspecified:
# ip nexthop add id 1 fdb via 127.0.0.1
# ip nexthop add id 10 fdb via default group 1
The nexthop code is still relatively new and likely not used very broadly,
and the FDB bits are newer still. Even though there is a reproducer out
there, it relies on an improbable gateway arguments "via default", "via
all" or "via any". Given all this, I believe it is OK to reformulate the
condition to do the right thing and bounce NHA_GATEWAY.
Fixes: 38428d6871
("nexthop: support for fdb ecmp nexthops")
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
eaa7a6c39d
commit
5fb8a3116c
@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int nh_check_attr_group(struct net *net, struct nlattr *tb[],
|
||||
for (i = NHA_GROUP_TYPE + 1; i < __NHA_MAX; ++i) {
|
||||
if (!tb[i])
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (tb[NHA_FDB])
|
||||
if (i == NHA_FDB)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
|
||||
"No other attributes can be set in nexthop groups");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user