mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 10:00:51 +07:00
freezer: add unsafe versions of freezable helpers for CIFS
CIFS calls wait_event_freezekillable_unsafe with a VFS lock held, which is unsafe and will cause lockdep warnings when6aa9707
"lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time" is reapplied (it was reverted indbf520a
). CIFS shouldn't be doing this, but it has long-running syscalls that must hold a lock but also shouldn't block suspend. Until CIFS freeze handling is rewritten to use a signal to exit out of the critical section, add a new wait_event_freezekillable_unsafe helper that will not run the lockdep test when6aa9707
is reapplied, and call it from CIFS. In practice the likley result of holding the lock while freezing is that a second task blocked on the lock will never freeze, aborting suspend, but it is possible to manufacture a case using the cgroup freezer, the lock, and the suspend freezer to create a deadlock. Silencing the lockdep warning here will allow problems to be found in other drivers that may have a more serious deadlock risk, and prevent new problems from being added. Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
416ad3c9c0
commit
5853cc2a89
@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ wait_for_response(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct mid_q_entry *midQ)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
|
||||
error = wait_event_freezekillable(server->response_q,
|
||||
error = wait_event_freezekillable_unsafe(server->response_q,
|
||||
midQ->mid_state != MID_REQUEST_SUBMITTED);
|
||||
if (error < 0)
|
||||
return -ERESTARTSYS;
|
||||
|
@ -212,6 +212,16 @@ static inline bool freezer_should_skip(struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
__retval; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
/* DO NOT ADD ANY NEW CALLERS OF THIS FUNCTION */
|
||||
#define wait_event_freezekillable_unsafe(wq, condition) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
int __retval; \
|
||||
freezer_do_not_count(); \
|
||||
__retval = wait_event_killable(wq, (condition)); \
|
||||
freezer_count_unsafe(); \
|
||||
__retval; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
#define wait_event_freezable(wq, condition) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
int __retval; \
|
||||
@ -277,6 +287,9 @@ static inline void set_freezable(void) {}
|
||||
#define wait_event_freezekillable(wq, condition) \
|
||||
wait_event_killable(wq, condition)
|
||||
|
||||
#define wait_event_freezekillable_unsafe(wq, condition) \
|
||||
wait_event_killable(wq, condition)
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* !CONFIG_FREEZER */
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* FREEZER_H_INCLUDED */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user