AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git synced 2024-11-24 02:10:52 +07:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

btrfs: Correctly handle empty trees in find_first_clear_extent_bit

Browse Source 
Raviu reported that running his regular fs_trim segfaulted with the
following backtrace:

[  237.525947] assertion failed: prev, in ../fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1595
[  237.525984] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  237.525985] kernel BUG at ../fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3117!
[  237.525992] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[  237.525998] CPU: 4 PID: 4423 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G     U     OE     5.4.14-8-vanilla #1
[  237.526001] Hardware name: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
[  237.526044] RIP: 0010:assfail.constprop.58+0x18/0x1a [btrfs]
[  237.526079] Call Trace:
[  237.526120]  find_first_clear_extent_bit+0x13d/0x150 [btrfs]
[  237.526148]  btrfs_trim_fs+0x211/0x3f0 [btrfs]
[  237.526184]  btrfs_ioctl_fitrim+0x103/0x170 [btrfs]
[  237.526219]  btrfs_ioctl+0x129a/0x2ed0 [btrfs]
[  237.526227]  ? filemap_map_pages+0x190/0x3d0
[  237.526232]  ? do_filp_open+0xaf/0x110
[  237.526238]  ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30
[  237.526242]  ? cp_new_stat+0x150/0x180
[  237.526247]  ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640
[  237.526278]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[  237.526283]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640
[  237.526288]  ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x3c/0x60
[  237.526292]  ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[  237.526297]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[  237.526303]  do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x1c0
[  237.526310]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

That was due to btrfs_fs_device::aloc_tree being empty. Initially I
thought this wasn't possible and as a percaution have put the assert in
find_first_clear_extent_bit. Turns out this is indeed possible and could
happen when a file system with SINGLE data/metadata profile has a 2nd
device added. Until balance is run or a new chunk is allocated on this
device it will be completely empty.

In this case find_first_clear_extent_bit should return the full range
[0, -1ULL] and let the caller handle this i.e for trim the end will be
capped at the size of actual device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/izW2WNyvy1dEDweBICizKnd2KDwDiDyY2EYQr4YCwk7pkuIpthx-JRn65MPBde00ND6V0_Lh8mW0kZwzDiLDv25pUYWxkskWNJnVP0kgdMA=@protonmail.com/
Fixes: 45bfcfc168 ("btrfs: Implement find_first_clear_extent_bit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nikolay Borisov 2020-01-27 11:59:26 +02:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 42ffb0bf58
commit 5750c37523
2 changed files with 27 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
View File

@ -1593,21 +1593,25 @@ void find_first_clear_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
/* Find first extent with bits cleared */
while (1) {
node = __etree_search(tree, start, &next, &prev, NULL, NULL);
if (!node) {
if (!node && !next && !prev) {
/*
* Tree is completely empty, send full range and let
* caller deal with it
*/
*start_ret = 0;
*end_ret = -1;
goto out;
} else if (!node && !next) {
/*
* We are past the last allocated chunk, set start at
* the end of the last extent.
*/
state = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_state, rb_node);
*start_ret = state->end + 1;
*end_ret = -1;
goto out;
} else if (!node) {
node = next;
if (!node) {
/*
* We are past the last allocated chunk,
* set start at the end of the last extent. The
* device alloc tree should never be empty so
* prev is always set.
*/
ASSERT(prev);
state = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_state, rb_node);
*start_ret = state->end + 1;
*end_ret = -1;
goto out;
}
}
/*
* At this point 'node' either contains 'start' or start is

9
fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
View File

@ -441,8 +441,17 @@ static int test_find_first_clear_extent_bit(void)
int ret = -EINVAL;
test_msg("running find_first_clear_extent_bit test");
extent_io_tree_init(NULL, &tree, IO_TREE_SELFTEST, NULL);
/* Test correct handling of empty tree */
find_first_clear_extent_bit(&tree, 0, &start, &end, CHUNK_TRIMMED);
if (start != 0 || end != -1) {
test_err(
"error getting a range from completely empty tree: start %llu end %llu",
start, end);
goto out;
}
/*
* Set 1M-4M alloc/discard and 32M-64M thus leaving a hole between
* 4M-32M