[ARM] Fix Versatile PB initialisation to use .init_machine

There's no point having the Versatile PB initialisation using an
arch_initcall() and then checking whether it's running on a
Versatile PB board - this is what the .init_machine function
pointer in the machine description is for.  Use it.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Russell King 2006-11-30 22:42:20 +00:00 committed by Russell King
parent 122214428a
commit 4e4e520fd5

View File

@ -81,22 +81,18 @@ static struct amba_device *amba_devs[] __initdata = {
&mmc1_device, &mmc1_device,
}; };
static int __init versatile_pb_init(void) static void __init versatile_pb_init(void)
{ {
int i; int i;
if (machine_is_versatile_pb()) { versatile_init();
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_devs); i++) {
struct amba_device *d = amba_devs[i]; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_devs); i++) {
amba_device_register(d, &iomem_resource); struct amba_device *d = amba_devs[i];
} amba_device_register(d, &iomem_resource);
} }
return 0;
} }
arch_initcall(versatile_pb_init);
MACHINE_START(VERSATILE_PB, "ARM-Versatile PB") MACHINE_START(VERSATILE_PB, "ARM-Versatile PB")
/* Maintainer: ARM Ltd/Deep Blue Solutions Ltd */ /* Maintainer: ARM Ltd/Deep Blue Solutions Ltd */
.phys_io = 0x101f1000, .phys_io = 0x101f1000,
@ -105,5 +101,5 @@ MACHINE_START(VERSATILE_PB, "ARM-Versatile PB")
.map_io = versatile_map_io, .map_io = versatile_map_io,
.init_irq = versatile_init_irq, .init_irq = versatile_init_irq,
.timer = &versatile_timer, .timer = &versatile_timer,
.init_machine = versatile_init, .init_machine = versatile_pb_init,
MACHINE_END MACHINE_END