mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 02:50:53 +07:00
locking/static_key: Fix concurrent static_key_slow_inc()
The following scenario is possible: CPU 1 CPU 2 static_key_slow_inc() atomic_inc_not_zero() -> key.enabled == 0, no increment jump_label_lock() atomic_inc_return() -> key.enabled == 1 now static_key_slow_inc() atomic_inc_not_zero() -> key.enabled == 1, inc to 2 return ** static key is wrong! jump_label_update() jump_label_unlock() Testing the static key at the point marked by (**) will follow the wrong path for jumps that have not been patched yet. This can actually happen when creating many KVM virtual machines with userspace LAPIC emulation; just run several copies of the following program: #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/ioctl.h> #include <linux/kvm.h> int main(void) { for (;;) { int kvmfd = open("/dev/kvm", O_RDONLY); int vmfd = ioctl(kvmfd, KVM_CREATE_VM, 0); close(ioctl(vmfd, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, 1)); close(vmfd); close(kvmfd); } return 0; } Every KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl will attempt a static_key_slow_inc() call. The static key's purpose is to skip NULL pointer checks and indeed one of the processes eventually dereferences NULL. As explained in the commit that introduced the bug:706249c222
("locking/static_keys: Rework update logic") jump_label_update() needs key.enabled to be true. The solution adopted here is to temporarily make key.enabled == -1, and use go down the slow path when key.enabled <= 0. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.3+ Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes:706249c222
("locking/static_keys: Rework update logic") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466527937-69798-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com [ Small stylistic edits to the changelog and the code. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
33688abb28
commit
4c5ea0a9cd
@ -117,13 +117,18 @@ struct module;
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/atomic.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int static_key_count(struct static_key *key)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return atomic_read(&key->enabled);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* -1 means the first static_key_slow_inc() is in progress.
|
||||
* static_key_enabled() must return true, so return 1 here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int n = atomic_read(&key->enabled);
|
||||
return n >= 0 ? n : 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
|
||||
|
||||
#define JUMP_TYPE_FALSE 0UL
|
||||
#define JUMP_TYPE_TRUE 1UL
|
||||
#define JUMP_TYPE_MASK 1UL
|
||||
@ -162,6 +167,11 @@ extern void jump_label_apply_nops(struct module *mod);
|
||||
|
||||
#else /* !HAVE_JUMP_LABEL */
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int static_key_count(struct static_key *key)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return atomic_read(&key->enabled);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __always_inline void jump_label_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static_key_initialized = true;
|
||||
|
@ -58,13 +58,36 @@ static void jump_label_update(struct static_key *key);
|
||||
|
||||
void static_key_slow_inc(struct static_key *key)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int v, v1;
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE();
|
||||
if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&key->enabled))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Careful if we get concurrent static_key_slow_inc() calls;
|
||||
* later calls must wait for the first one to _finish_ the
|
||||
* jump_label_update() process. At the same time, however,
|
||||
* the jump_label_update() call below wants to see
|
||||
* static_key_enabled(&key) for jumps to be updated properly.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* So give a special meaning to negative key->enabled: it sends
|
||||
* static_key_slow_inc() down the slow path, and it is non-zero
|
||||
* so it counts as "enabled" in jump_label_update(). Note that
|
||||
* atomic_inc_unless_negative() checks >= 0, so roll our own.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (v = atomic_read(&key->enabled); v > 0; v = v1) {
|
||||
v1 = atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, v, v + 1);
|
||||
if (likely(v1 == v))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
jump_label_lock();
|
||||
if (atomic_inc_return(&key->enabled) == 1)
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) == 0) {
|
||||
atomic_set(&key->enabled, -1);
|
||||
jump_label_update(key);
|
||||
atomic_set(&key->enabled, 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
atomic_inc(&key->enabled);
|
||||
}
|
||||
jump_label_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_inc);
|
||||
@ -72,6 +95,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_inc);
|
||||
static void __static_key_slow_dec(struct static_key *key,
|
||||
unsigned long rate_limit, struct delayed_work *work)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The negative count check is valid even when a negative
|
||||
* key->enabled is in use by static_key_slow_inc(); a
|
||||
* __static_key_slow_dec() before the first static_key_slow_inc()
|
||||
* returns is unbalanced, because all other static_key_slow_inc()
|
||||
* instances block while the update is in progress.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(&key->enabled, &jump_label_mutex)) {
|
||||
WARN(atomic_read(&key->enabled) < 0,
|
||||
"jump label: negative count!\n");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user