mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-01-18 16:06:16 +07:00
drm/i915: Wrap engine->schedule in RCU locks for set-wedge protection
Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we
need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling
engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the
queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that
point, it will be lost.
Fixes: af7a8ffad9
("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef5032a06a
commit
47650db02d
@ -479,10 +479,11 @@ static void __fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, int prio)
|
||||
|
||||
rq = to_request(fence);
|
||||
engine = rq->engine;
|
||||
if (!engine->schedule)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
engine->schedule(rq, prio);
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
if (engine->schedule)
|
||||
engine->schedule(rq, prio);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, int prio)
|
||||
@ -3222,8 +3223,11 @@ void i915_gem_set_wedged(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) {
|
||||
i915_gem_reset_prepare_engine(engine);
|
||||
|
||||
engine->submit_request = nop_submit_request;
|
||||
engine->schedule = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
i915->caps.scheduler = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure no one is running the old callback before we proceed with
|
||||
@ -3241,11 +3245,8 @@ void i915_gem_set_wedged(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
|
||||
* start to complete all requests.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
engine->submit_request = nop_complete_submit_request;
|
||||
engine->schedule = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
i915->caps.scheduler = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure no request can slip through without getting completed by
|
||||
* either this call here to intel_engine_init_global_seqno, or the one
|
||||
|
@ -1081,8 +1081,10 @@ void __i915_request_add(struct i915_request *request, bool flush_caches)
|
||||
* decide whether to preempt the entire chain so that it is ready to
|
||||
* run at the earliest possible convenience.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
if (engine->schedule)
|
||||
engine->schedule(request, request->ctx->priority);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
local_bh_disable();
|
||||
i915_sw_fence_commit(&request->submit);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user