mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-30 10:16:41 +07:00
can: pch_can: fix error passive level test
The test (((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) > 127) would always be false because the receive error counter ((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) is at most 127, where PCH_REC is defined as 0x7f00. To test whether the receive error counter has reached the error passive level, the RP bit (15) should be used. Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e3f240f460
commit
44b0052c5c
@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
|
||||
#define PCH_IF_CREQ_BUSY BIT(15)
|
||||
|
||||
#define PCH_STATUS_INT 0x8000
|
||||
#define PCH_RP 0x00008000
|
||||
#define PCH_REC 0x00007f00
|
||||
#define PCH_TEC 0x000000ff
|
||||
|
||||
@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ static void pch_can_error(struct net_device *ndev, u32 status)
|
||||
priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
|
||||
state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
|
||||
cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
|
||||
if (((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) > 127)
|
||||
if (errc & PCH_RP)
|
||||
cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
|
||||
if ((errc & PCH_TEC) > 127)
|
||||
cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user