mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-19 22:31:08 +07:00
sched/fair: Optimize dequeue_task_fair()
While looking at enqueue_task_fair and dequeue_task_fair, it occurred
to me that dequeue_task_fair can also be optimized as Vincent described
in commit 7d148be69e
("sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fair()").
When encountering throttled cfs_rq, dequeue_throttle label can ensure
se not to be NULL, and rq->nr_running remains unchanged, so we can also
skip the early balance check.
Signed-off-by: Peng Wang <rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/701eef9a40de93dcf5fe7063fd607bca5db38e05.1592287263.git.rocking@linux.alibaba.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa93cd53bc
commit
423d02e146
@ -5624,14 +5624,14 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dequeue_throttle:
|
||||
if (!se)
|
||||
sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
|
||||
/* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/
|
||||
sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* balance early to pull high priority tasks */
|
||||
if (unlikely(!was_sched_idle && sched_idle_rq(rq)))
|
||||
rq->next_balance = jiffies;
|
||||
|
||||
dequeue_throttle:
|
||||
util_est_dequeue(&rq->cfs, p, task_sleep);
|
||||
hrtick_update(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user