mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-25 13:51:00 +07:00
selftests: mlxsw: Add TC flower test for Spectrum-2
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Ido Schimmel
David S. Miller
parent
c86d62cc41
commit
3dd9157056
366
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh
Executable file
366
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh
Executable file
@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/bash
|
||||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||||
|
||||
# This test is for checking the A-TCAM and C-TCAM operation in Spectrum-2.
|
||||
# It tries to exercise as many code paths in the eRP state machine as
|
||||
# possible.
|
||||
|
||||
lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../../net/forwarding
|
||||
|
||||
ALL_TESTS="single_mask_test identical_filters_test two_masks_test \
|
||||
multiple_masks_test ctcam_edge_cases_test"
|
||||
NUM_NETIFS=2
|
||||
source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
|
||||
source $lib_dir/lib.sh
|
||||
|
||||
tcflags="skip_hw"
|
||||
|
||||
h1_create()
|
||||
{
|
||||
simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
h1_destroy()
|
||||
{
|
||||
simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
h2_create()
|
||||
{
|
||||
simple_if_init $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24
|
||||
tc qdisc add dev $h2 clsact
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
h2_destroy()
|
||||
{
|
||||
tc qdisc del dev $h2 clsact
|
||||
simple_if_fini $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
single_mask_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
# When only a single mask is required, the device uses the master
|
||||
# mask and not the eRP table. Verify that under this mode the right
|
||||
# filter is matched
|
||||
|
||||
RET=0
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Single filter - did not match"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 198.51.100.2 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 2
|
||||
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority"
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match lowest priority"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2
|
||||
check_err $? "Single filter - did not match after delete"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
|
||||
|
||||
log_test "single mask test ($tcflags)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
identical_filters_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
# When two filters that only differ in their priority are used,
|
||||
# one needs to be inserted into the C-TCAM. This test verifies
|
||||
# that filters are correctly spilled to C-TCAM and that the right
|
||||
# filter is matched
|
||||
|
||||
RET=0
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM delete"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM add"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter after C-TCAM delete"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
|
||||
|
||||
log_test "identical filters test ($tcflags)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
two_masks_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
# When more than one mask is required, the eRP table is used. This
|
||||
# test verifies that the eRP table is correctly allocated and used
|
||||
|
||||
RET=0
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.0.0/16 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Single filter - did not match"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority after add"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
|
||||
|
||||
log_test "two masks test ($tcflags)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
multiple_masks_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
# The number of masks in a region is limited. Once the maximum
|
||||
# number of masks has been reached filters that require new
|
||||
# masks are spilled to the C-TCAM. This test verifies that
|
||||
# spillage is performed correctly and that the right filter is
|
||||
# matched
|
||||
|
||||
local index
|
||||
|
||||
RET=0
|
||||
|
||||
NUM_MASKS=32
|
||||
BASE_INDEX=100
|
||||
|
||||
for i in $(eval echo {1..$NUM_MASKS}); do
|
||||
index=$((BASE_INDEX - i))
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \
|
||||
handle $index \
|
||||
flower $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2/${i} src_ip 192.0.2.1 \
|
||||
action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \
|
||||
-B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 1
|
||||
check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (add)"
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
for i in $(eval echo {$NUM_MASKS..1}); do
|
||||
index=$((BASE_INDEX - i))
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \
|
||||
-B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 2
|
||||
check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (del)"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \
|
||||
handle $index flower
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
log_test "multiple masks test ($tcflags)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
RET=0
|
||||
|
||||
# First case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are two A-TCAM masks.
|
||||
# We push a filter into the C-TCAM by using two identical filters
|
||||
# as in identical_filters_test()
|
||||
|
||||
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
# Filter goes into C-TCAM
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
|
||||
|
||||
# Delete both A-TCAM and C-TCAM filters and make sure the remaining
|
||||
# A-TCAM filter still works
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
|
||||
|
||||
log_test "ctcam with two atcam masks test ($tcflags)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
RET=0
|
||||
|
||||
# Second case: C-TCAM is disabled when there is one A-TCAM mask.
|
||||
# The test is similar to identical_filters_test()
|
||||
|
||||
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
# Filter goes into C-TCAM
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
|
||||
|
||||
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
|
||||
-t ip -q
|
||||
|
||||
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
|
||||
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
|
||||
|
||||
log_test "ctcam with one atcam mask test ($tcflags)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
RET=0
|
||||
|
||||
# Third case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are no A-TCAM masks
|
||||
# This test exercises the code path that transitions the eRP table
|
||||
# to its initial state after deleting the last C-TCAM mask
|
||||
|
||||
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
# Filter goes into C-TCAM
|
||||
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
|
||||
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
|
||||
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
|
||||
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
|
||||
|
||||
log_test "ctcam with no atcam masks test ($tcflags)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctcam_edge_cases_test()
|
||||
{
|
||||
# When the C-TCAM is disabled after deleting the last C-TCAM
|
||||
# mask, we want to make sure the eRP state machine is put in
|
||||
# the correct state
|
||||
|
||||
ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test
|
||||
ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test
|
||||
ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
setup_prepare()
|
||||
{
|
||||
h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
|
||||
h2=${NETIFS[p2]}
|
||||
h1mac=$(mac_get $h1)
|
||||
h2mac=$(mac_get $h2)
|
||||
|
||||
vrf_prepare
|
||||
|
||||
h1_create
|
||||
h2_create
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cleanup()
|
||||
{
|
||||
pre_cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
h2_destroy
|
||||
h1_destroy
|
||||
|
||||
vrf_cleanup
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
trap cleanup EXIT
|
||||
|
||||
setup_prepare
|
||||
setup_wait
|
||||
|
||||
tests_run
|
||||
|
||||
if ! tc_offload_check; then
|
||||
check_err 1 "Could not test offloaded functionality"
|
||||
log_test "mlxsw-specific tests for tc flower"
|
||||
exit
|
||||
else
|
||||
tcflags="skip_sw"
|
||||
tests_run
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
exit $EXIT_STATUS
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user