mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-14 02:06:54 +07:00
dm snapshot: improve performance by switching out_of_order_list to rbtree
copy_complete()'s processing of out_of_order_list can result in quadratic complexity in the worst case. As such it was the source of consuming too much cpu and the source of significant loss in performance. Fix this by converting out_of_order_list to an rbtree. This improved a dm-snapshot test copy workload from 32 seconds to 4 seconds. Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Tested-by: Brett Hull <bhull@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
784c9a29e9
commit
3db2776d9f
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ struct dm_snapshot {
|
||||
* A list of pending exceptions that completed out of order.
|
||||
* Protected by kcopyd single-threaded callback.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct list_head out_of_order_list;
|
||||
struct rb_root out_of_order_tree;
|
||||
|
||||
mempool_t pending_pool;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ struct dm_snap_pending_exception {
|
||||
/* A sequence number, it is used for in-order completion. */
|
||||
sector_t exception_sequence;
|
||||
|
||||
struct list_head out_of_order_entry;
|
||||
struct rb_node out_of_order_node;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For writing a complete chunk, bypassing the copy.
|
||||
@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ static int snapshot_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
atomic_set(&s->pending_exceptions_count, 0);
|
||||
s->exception_start_sequence = 0;
|
||||
s->exception_complete_sequence = 0;
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->out_of_order_list);
|
||||
s->out_of_order_tree = RB_ROOT;
|
||||
mutex_init(&s->lock);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->list);
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&s->pe_lock);
|
||||
@ -1539,28 +1539,41 @@ static void copy_callback(int read_err, unsigned long write_err, void *context)
|
||||
pe->copy_error = read_err || write_err;
|
||||
|
||||
if (pe->exception_sequence == s->exception_complete_sequence) {
|
||||
struct rb_node *next;
|
||||
|
||||
s->exception_complete_sequence++;
|
||||
complete_exception(pe);
|
||||
|
||||
while (!list_empty(&s->out_of_order_list)) {
|
||||
pe = list_entry(s->out_of_order_list.next,
|
||||
struct dm_snap_pending_exception, out_of_order_entry);
|
||||
next = rb_first(&s->out_of_order_tree);
|
||||
while (next) {
|
||||
pe = rb_entry(next, struct dm_snap_pending_exception,
|
||||
out_of_order_node);
|
||||
if (pe->exception_sequence != s->exception_complete_sequence)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
next = rb_next(next);
|
||||
s->exception_complete_sequence++;
|
||||
list_del(&pe->out_of_order_entry);
|
||||
rb_erase(&pe->out_of_order_node, &s->out_of_order_tree);
|
||||
complete_exception(pe);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
struct list_head *lh;
|
||||
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
|
||||
struct rb_node **p = &s->out_of_order_tree.rb_node;
|
||||
struct dm_snap_pending_exception *pe2;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_prev(lh, &s->out_of_order_list) {
|
||||
pe2 = list_entry(lh, struct dm_snap_pending_exception, out_of_order_entry);
|
||||
if (pe2->exception_sequence < pe->exception_sequence)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
while (*p) {
|
||||
pe2 = rb_entry(*p, struct dm_snap_pending_exception, out_of_order_node);
|
||||
parent = *p;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(pe->exception_sequence == pe2->exception_sequence);
|
||||
if (pe->exception_sequence < pe2->exception_sequence)
|
||||
p = &((*p)->rb_left);
|
||||
else
|
||||
p = &((*p)->rb_right);
|
||||
}
|
||||
list_add(&pe->out_of_order_entry, lh);
|
||||
|
||||
rb_link_node(&pe->out_of_order_node, parent, p);
|
||||
rb_insert_color(&pe->out_of_order_node, &s->out_of_order_tree);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user