mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-26 12:20:50 +07:00
x86: fix numaq_tsc_disable calling
got this on a test-system: calling numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39 NUMAQ: disabling TSC initcall numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39 returned 0 after 0 msecs that's because we should not be using arch_initcall to call numaq_tsc_disable. need to call it in setup_arch before time_init()/tsc_init() and call it in init_intel() to make the cpu feature bits right. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b479becdb
commit
3d88cca708
@ -226,6 +226,10 @@ static void __cpuinit init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_has_bts)
|
||||
ds_init_intel(c);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
|
||||
numaq_tsc_disable();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int __cpuinit intel_size_cache(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int size)
|
||||
|
@ -93,12 +93,13 @@ int __init get_memcfg_numaq(void)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init numaq_tsc_disable(void)
|
||||
void __init numaq_tsc_disable(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!found_numaq)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (num_online_nodes() > 1) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_DEBUG "NUMAQ: disabling TSC\n");
|
||||
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
arch_initcall(numaq_tsc_disable);
|
||||
|
@ -849,6 +849,14 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
|
||||
init_cpu_to_node();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* need to check online nodes num, call it
|
||||
* here before time_init/tsc_init
|
||||
*/
|
||||
numaq_tsc_disable();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
init_apic_mappings();
|
||||
ioapic_init_mappings();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ struct sys_cfg_data {
|
||||
struct eachquadmem eq[MAX_NUMNODES]; /* indexed by quad id */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void numaq_tsc_disable(void);
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static inline int get_memcfg_numaq(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user