mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-28 02:05:20 +07:00
KVM: Dynamically size memslot array based on number of used slots
Now that the memslot logic doesn't assume memslots are always non-NULL, dynamically size the array of memslots instead of unconditionally allocating memory for the maximum number of memslots. Note, because a to-be-deleted memslot must first be invalidated, the array size cannot be immediately reduced when deleting a memslot. However, consecutive deletions will realize the memory savings, i.e. a second deletion will trim the entry. Tested-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0577d1abe7
commit
36947254e5
@ -431,11 +431,11 @@ static inline int kvm_arch_vcpu_memslots_id(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
|||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
struct kvm_memslots {
|
struct kvm_memslots {
|
||||||
u64 generation;
|
u64 generation;
|
||||||
struct kvm_memory_slot memslots[KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM];
|
|
||||||
/* The mapping table from slot id to the index in memslots[]. */
|
/* The mapping table from slot id to the index in memslots[]. */
|
||||||
short id_to_index[KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM];
|
short id_to_index[KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM];
|
||||||
atomic_t lru_slot;
|
atomic_t lru_slot;
|
||||||
int used_slots;
|
int used_slots;
|
||||||
|
struct kvm_memory_slot memslots[];
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
struct kvm {
|
struct kvm {
|
||||||
|
@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ static struct kvm_memslots *kvm_alloc_memslots(void)
|
|||||||
return NULL;
|
return NULL;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM; i++)
|
for (i = 0; i < KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM; i++)
|
||||||
slots->id_to_index[i] = slots->memslots[i].id = -1;
|
slots->id_to_index[i] = -1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return slots;
|
return slots;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -1078,6 +1078,32 @@ static struct kvm_memslots *install_new_memslots(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||||||
return old_memslots;
|
return old_memslots;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Note, at a minimum, the current number of used slots must be allocated, even
|
||||||
|
* when deleting a memslot, as we need a complete duplicate of the memslots for
|
||||||
|
* use when invalidating a memslot prior to deleting/moving the memslot.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
static struct kvm_memslots *kvm_dup_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *old,
|
||||||
|
enum kvm_mr_change change)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
struct kvm_memslots *slots;
|
||||||
|
size_t old_size, new_size;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
old_size = sizeof(struct kvm_memslots) +
|
||||||
|
(sizeof(struct kvm_memory_slot) * old->used_slots);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (change == KVM_MR_CREATE)
|
||||||
|
new_size = old_size + sizeof(struct kvm_memory_slot);
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
new_size = old_size;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
slots = kvzalloc(new_size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
|
||||||
|
if (likely(slots))
|
||||||
|
memcpy(slots, old, old_size);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return slots;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int kvm_set_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
|
static int kvm_set_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
|
||||||
const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem,
|
const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem,
|
||||||
struct kvm_memory_slot *old,
|
struct kvm_memory_slot *old,
|
||||||
@ -1088,10 +1114,9 @@ static int kvm_set_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||||||
struct kvm_memslots *slots;
|
struct kvm_memslots *slots;
|
||||||
int r;
|
int r;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
slots = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_memslots), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
|
slots = kvm_dup_memslots(__kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id), change);
|
||||||
if (!slots)
|
if (!slots)
|
||||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||||
memcpy(slots, __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id), sizeof(struct kvm_memslots));
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (change == KVM_MR_DELETE || change == KVM_MR_MOVE) {
|
if (change == KVM_MR_DELETE || change == KVM_MR_MOVE) {
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user