mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 14:51:00 +07:00
cfg80211: fix rfkill locking problem
rfkill currently requires a global lock within the rfkill_register() function, and holds that lock over calls to the set_block() methods. This means that we cannot hold a lock around rfkill_register() that we also require in set_block(), directly or indirectly. Fix cfg80211 to register rfkill outside the block locked by its global lock. Much of what cfg80211 does in the locked block doesn't need to be locked anyway. Reported-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4e751843d4
commit
2f0accc135
@ -395,21 +395,23 @@ int wiphy_register(struct wiphy *wiphy)
|
||||
/* check and set up bitrates */
|
||||
ieee80211_set_bitrate_flags(wiphy);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cfg80211_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* set up regulatory info */
|
||||
wiphy_update_regulatory(wiphy, NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_CORE);
|
||||
|
||||
res = device_add(&drv->wiphy.dev);
|
||||
if (res)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
|
||||
res = rfkill_register(drv->rfkill);
|
||||
if (res)
|
||||
goto out_rm_dev;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cfg80211_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* set up regulatory info */
|
||||
wiphy_update_regulatory(wiphy, NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_CORE);
|
||||
|
||||
list_add(&drv->list, &cfg80211_drv_list);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cfg80211_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* add to debugfs */
|
||||
drv->wiphy.debugfsdir =
|
||||
debugfs_create_dir(wiphy_name(&drv->wiphy),
|
||||
@ -430,13 +432,10 @@ int wiphy_register(struct wiphy *wiphy)
|
||||
|
||||
cfg80211_debugfs_drv_add(drv);
|
||||
|
||||
res = 0;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
out_rm_dev:
|
||||
device_del(&drv->wiphy.dev);
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cfg80211_mutex);
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wiphy_register);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user