mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 04:30:52 +07:00
skip writing data pages when inode is under I_SYNC
Since I_SYNC was split out from I_LOCK, the concern in commit
4b89eed93e
("Write back inode data pages
even when the inode itself is locked") is not longer valid.
We should revert to the original behavior: in __writeback_single_inode(),
when we find an I_SYNC-ed inode and we're not doing a data-integrity sync,
skip writing entirely. Otherwise, we are double calling do_writepages()
Signed-off-by: Qi Yong <qiyong@fc-cn.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Joern Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: WU Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a9bbdcd29
commit
2d544564f9
@ -334,9 +334,6 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
||||
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_SYNC)) {
|
||||
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We're skipping this inode because it's locked, and we're not
|
||||
* doing writeback-for-data-integrity. Move it to s_more_io so
|
||||
@ -345,15 +342,7 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
||||
* completed a full scan of s_io.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
requeue_io(inode);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Even if we don't actually write the inode itself here,
|
||||
* we can at least start some of the data writeout..
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
|
||||
ret = do_writepages(mapping, wbc);
|
||||
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user