mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-30 13:56:53 +07:00
net/mlx4_core: Don't fail reg/unreg vlan for older guests
In upstream kernels under SRIOV, the vlan register/unregister calls were NOPs (doing nothing and returning OK). We detect these old calls from guests (via the comm channel), since previously the port number in mlx4_register_vlan was passed (improperly) in the out_param. This has been corrected so that the port number is now passed in bits 8..15 of the in_modifier field. For old calls, these bits will be zero, so if the passed port number is zero, we can still look at the out_param field to see if it contains a valid port number. If yes, the VM is running an old driver. Since for old drivers, the register/unregister_vlan wrappers were NOPs, we continue this policy -- the reason being that upstream had an additional bug in eth driver running on guests (where procedure mlx4_en_vlan_rx_kill_vid() had the following code: if (!mlx4_find_cached_vlan(mdev->dev, priv->port, vid, &idx)) mlx4_unregister_vlan(mdev->dev, priv->port, idx); else en_err(priv, "could not find vid %d in cache\n", vid); On a VM, mlx4_find_cached_vlan() will always fail, since the vlan cache is located on the Hypervisor; on guests it is empty. Therefore, if we allow upstream guests to register vlans, we will have vlan leakage since the unregister will never be performed. Leaving vlan reg/unreg for old guest drivers as a NOP is not a feature regression, since in upstream the register/unregister vlan wrapper is a NOP. Signed-off-by: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4874080dee
commit
2c957ff27d
@ -1718,6 +1718,7 @@ static void mlx4_master_do_cmd(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, u8 cmd,
|
||||
if (cmd == MLX4_COMM_CMD_RESET) {
|
||||
mlx4_warn(dev, "Received reset from slave:%d\n", slave);
|
||||
slave_state[slave].active = false;
|
||||
slave_state[slave].old_vlan_api = false;
|
||||
mlx4_master_deactivate_admin_state(priv, slave);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < MLX4_EVENT_TYPES_NUM; ++i) {
|
||||
slave_state[slave].event_eq[i].eqn = -1;
|
||||
|
@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ struct mlx4_slave_state {
|
||||
u8 last_cmd;
|
||||
u8 init_port_mask;
|
||||
bool active;
|
||||
bool old_vlan_api;
|
||||
u8 function;
|
||||
dma_addr_t vhcr_dma;
|
||||
u16 mtu[MLX4_MAX_PORTS + 1];
|
||||
|
@ -1555,15 +1555,26 @@ static void rem_slave_vlans(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int vlan_alloc_res(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, int op, int cmd,
|
||||
u64 in_param, u64 *out_param, int port)
|
||||
u64 in_param, u64 *out_param, int in_port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
|
||||
struct mlx4_slave_state *slave_state = priv->mfunc.master.slave_state;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
u16 vlan;
|
||||
int vlan_index;
|
||||
int port;
|
||||
|
||||
port = !in_port ? get_param_l(out_param) : in_port;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!port || op != RES_OP_RESERVE_AND_MAP)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* upstream kernels had NOP for reg/unreg vlan. Continue this. */
|
||||
if (!in_port && port > 0 && port <= dev->caps.num_ports) {
|
||||
slave_state[slave].old_vlan_api = true;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
vlan = (u16) in_param;
|
||||
|
||||
err = __mlx4_register_vlan(dev, port, vlan, &vlan_index);
|
||||
@ -1856,10 +1867,14 @@ static int mac_free_res(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, int op, int cmd,
|
||||
static int vlan_free_res(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, int op, int cmd,
|
||||
u64 in_param, u64 *out_param, int port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
|
||||
struct mlx4_slave_state *slave_state = priv->mfunc.master.slave_state;
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case RES_OP_RESERVE_AND_MAP:
|
||||
if (slave_state[slave].old_vlan_api)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (!port)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
vlan_del_from_slave(dev, slave, in_param, port);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user