mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-26 00:30:53 +07:00
ARM: 6330/1: perf: reword comments relating to perf_event_do_pending
This is purely a cosmetic change to the ARM perf backend because the current comments about the relationship between NMIs, interrupt context and perf_event_do_pending are misleading. This patch updates the comments so that they reflect what the code actually does (which is in line with other architectures). Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2bfc96a127
commit
25d3584797
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
|
||||
* counter interrupts are regular interrupts and not an NMI. This
|
||||
* means that when we receive the interrupt we can call
|
||||
* perf_event_do_pending() that handles all of the work with
|
||||
* interrupts enabled.
|
||||
* interrupts disabled.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
set_perf_event_pending(void)
|
||||
|
@ -1041,8 +1041,8 @@ armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Handle the pending perf events.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts enabled. For
|
||||
* platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as a PMI, this
|
||||
* Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts disabled. For
|
||||
* platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as an NMI, this
|
||||
* will not work.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
perf_event_do_pending();
|
||||
@ -2017,8 +2017,8 @@ static irqreturn_t armv7pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Handle the pending perf events.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts enabled. For
|
||||
* platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as a PMI, this
|
||||
* Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts disabled. For
|
||||
* platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as an NMI, this
|
||||
* will not work.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
perf_event_do_pending();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user