mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-04 02:16:45 +07:00
block: use lcm_not_zero() when stacking chunk_sectors
Like 'io_opt', blk_stack_limits() should stack 'chunk_sectors' using lcm_not_zero() rather than min_not_zero() -- otherwise the final 'chunk_sectors' could result in sub-optimal alignment of IO to component devices in the IO stack. Also, if 'chunk_sectors' isn't a multiple of 'physical_block_size' then it is a bug in the driver and the device should be flagged as 'misaligned'. Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0385971754
commit
22ada802ed
@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
|
||||
|
||||
t->io_min = max(t->io_min, b->io_min);
|
||||
t->io_opt = lcm_not_zero(t->io_opt, b->io_opt);
|
||||
t->chunk_sectors = lcm_not_zero(t->chunk_sectors, b->chunk_sectors);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Physical block size a multiple of the logical block size? */
|
||||
if (t->physical_block_size & (t->logical_block_size - 1)) {
|
||||
@ -556,6 +557,13 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
|
||||
ret = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* chunk_sectors a multiple of the physical block size? */
|
||||
if ((t->chunk_sectors << 9) & (t->physical_block_size - 1)) {
|
||||
t->chunk_sectors = 0;
|
||||
t->misaligned = 1;
|
||||
ret = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t->raid_partial_stripes_expensive =
|
||||
max(t->raid_partial_stripes_expensive,
|
||||
b->raid_partial_stripes_expensive);
|
||||
@ -594,10 +602,6 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
|
||||
t->discard_granularity;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (b->chunk_sectors)
|
||||
t->chunk_sectors = min_not_zero(t->chunk_sectors,
|
||||
b->chunk_sectors);
|
||||
|
||||
t->zoned = max(t->zoned, b->zoned);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user