mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-26 22:30:54 +07:00
drbd: Rename drbd_pp_first_pages_or_try_alloc() to __drbd_alloc_pages()
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4da15374b
commit
18c2d52249
@ -150,11 +150,12 @@ static void page_chain_add(struct page **head,
|
||||
*head = chain_first;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct page *drbd_pp_first_pages_or_try_alloc(struct drbd_conf *mdev, int number)
|
||||
static struct page *__drbd_alloc_pages(struct drbd_conf *mdev,
|
||||
unsigned int number)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct page *page = NULL;
|
||||
struct page *tmp = NULL;
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
unsigned int i = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Yes, testing drbd_pp_vacant outside the lock is racy.
|
||||
* So what. It saves a spin_lock. */
|
||||
@ -247,7 +248,7 @@ static struct page *drbd_pp_alloc(struct drbd_conf *mdev, unsigned number, bool
|
||||
/* Yes, we may run up to @number over max_buffers. If we
|
||||
* follow it strictly, the admin will get it wrong anyways. */
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&mdev->pp_in_use) < mdev->tconn->net_conf->max_buffers)
|
||||
page = drbd_pp_first_pages_or_try_alloc(mdev, number);
|
||||
page = __drbd_alloc_pages(mdev, number);
|
||||
|
||||
while (page == NULL) {
|
||||
prepare_to_wait(&drbd_pp_wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
@ -255,7 +256,7 @@ static struct page *drbd_pp_alloc(struct drbd_conf *mdev, unsigned number, bool
|
||||
drbd_kick_lo_and_reclaim_net(mdev);
|
||||
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&mdev->pp_in_use) < mdev->tconn->net_conf->max_buffers) {
|
||||
page = drbd_pp_first_pages_or_try_alloc(mdev, number);
|
||||
page = __drbd_alloc_pages(mdev, number);
|
||||
if (page)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user