s390/mm: correct comment about segment table entries

The comment describing the bit encoding for segment table entries
is incorrect in regard to the read and write bits. The segment
read bit is 0x0002 and write is 0x0001, not the other way around.

Reported-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Martin Schwidefsky 2016-02-10 16:47:14 +01:00
parent 758d39ebd3
commit 13c6a790d7

View File

@ -298,15 +298,15 @@ static inline int is_module_addr(void *addr)
/*
* Segment table entry encoding (R = read-only, I = invalid, y = young bit):
* dy..R...I...wr
* dy..R...I...rw
* prot-none, clean, old 00..1...1...00
* prot-none, clean, young 01..1...1...00
* prot-none, dirty, old 10..1...1...00
* prot-none, dirty, young 11..1...1...00
* read-only, clean, old 00..1...1...01
* read-only, clean, young 01..1...0...01
* read-only, dirty, old 10..1...1...01
* read-only, dirty, young 11..1...0...01
* read-only, clean, old 00..1...1...10
* read-only, clean, young 01..1...0...10
* read-only, dirty, old 10..1...1...10
* read-only, dirty, young 11..1...0...10
* read-write, clean, old 00..1...1...11
* read-write, clean, young 01..1...0...11
* read-write, dirty, old 10..0...1...11