mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-14 17:36:44 +07:00
fm10k: don't use BIT() macro where the value isn't a bitmask
The FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD is really just using a bitshift as a power of 2 operation in an efficient manner. We shouldn't represent this as a BIT() because that obscures the intention of the operation. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <Krishneil.k.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6f30e8b022
commit
124579de46
@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline u16 fm10k_desc_unused(struct fm10k_ring *ring)
|
||||
(&(((union fm10k_rx_desc *)((R)->desc))[i]))
|
||||
|
||||
#define FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR 14
|
||||
#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD BIT(FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR)
|
||||
#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD (1u << FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Tx Descriptors needed, worst case */
|
||||
#define TXD_USE_COUNT(S) DIV_ROUND_UP((S), FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user