mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-28 11:18:45 +07:00
x86/mm: Drop unused MAX_PHYSADDR_BITS
The macro is not used anywhere, and has an incorrect value (going by the
comment) on x86_64 since commit c898faf91b
("x86: 46 bit physical address
support on 64 bits")
To avoid confusion, just remove the definition.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723231544.17274-2-nivedita@alum.mit.edu
This commit is contained in:
parent
99e40204e0
commit
0a787b28b7
@ -10,24 +10,20 @@
|
|||||||
* field of the struct page
|
* field of the struct page
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* SECTION_SIZE_BITS 2^n: size of each section
|
* SECTION_SIZE_BITS 2^n: size of each section
|
||||||
* MAX_PHYSADDR_BITS 2^n: max size of physical address space
|
* MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS 2^n: max size of physical address space
|
||||||
* MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS 2^n: how much memory we can have in that space
|
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
|
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
|
||||||
# ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
|
# ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
|
||||||
# define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 29
|
# define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 29
|
||||||
# define MAX_PHYSADDR_BITS 36
|
|
||||||
# define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS 36
|
# define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS 36
|
||||||
# else
|
# else
|
||||||
# define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 26
|
# define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 26
|
||||||
# define MAX_PHYSADDR_BITS 32
|
|
||||||
# define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS 32
|
# define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS 32
|
||||||
# endif
|
# endif
|
||||||
#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
|
#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
|
||||||
# define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 27 /* matt - 128 is convenient right now */
|
# define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 27 /* matt - 128 is convenient right now */
|
||||||
# define MAX_PHYSADDR_BITS (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 52 : 44)
|
|
||||||
# define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 52 : 46)
|
# define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 52 : 46)
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user