mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 07:40:53 +07:00
Btrfs: do not do filemap_write_and_wait_range in fsync
We already do the btrfs_wait_ordered_range which will do this for us, so just remove this call so we don't call it twice. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
551ebb2d34
commit
0885ef5b56
@ -1497,14 +1497,15 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
|
||||
|
||||
trace_btrfs_sync_file(file, datasync);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* we wait first, since the writeback may change the inode */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* we wait first, since the writeback may change the inode, also wait
|
||||
* ordered range does a filemape_write_and_wait_range which is why we
|
||||
* don't do it above like other file systems.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
root->log_batch++;
|
||||
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
|
||||
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, start, end);
|
||||
root->log_batch++;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user