mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 12:20:52 +07:00
dm cache: fix a lock-inversion
When suspending a cache the policy is walked and the individual policy hints written to the metadata via sync_metadata(). This led to this lock order: policy->lock cache_metadata->root_lock When loading the cache target the policy is populated while the metadata lock is held: cache_metadata->root_lock policy->lock Fix this potential lock-inversion (ABBA) deadlock in sync_metadata() by ensuring the cache_metadata root_lock is held whilst all the hints are written, rather than being repeatedly locked while policy->lock is held (as was the case with each callout that policy_walk_mappings() made to the old save_hint() method). Found by turning on the CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING ("Lock debugging: prove locking correctness") build option. However, it is not clear how the LOCKDEP reported paths can lead to a deadlock since the two paths, suspending a target and loading a target, never occur at the same time. But that doesn't mean the same lock-inversion couldn't have occurred elsewhere. Reported-by: Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
67324ea188
commit
0596661f0a
@ -1245,22 +1245,12 @@ static int begin_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *po
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int dm_cache_begin_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *policy)
|
||||
static int save_hint(void *context, dm_cblock_t cblock, dm_oblock_t oblock, uint32_t hint)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&cmd->root_lock);
|
||||
r = begin_hints(cmd, policy);
|
||||
up_write(&cmd->root_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, dm_cblock_t cblock,
|
||||
uint32_t hint)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd = context;
|
||||
__le32 value = cpu_to_le32(hint);
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
__dm_bless_for_disk(&value);
|
||||
|
||||
r = dm_array_set_value(&cmd->hint_info, cmd->hint_root,
|
||||
@ -1270,16 +1260,25 @@ static int save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, dm_cblock_t cblock,
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int dm_cache_save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, dm_cblock_t cblock,
|
||||
uint32_t hint)
|
||||
static int write_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hints_array_initialized(cmd))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
r = begin_hints(cmd, policy);
|
||||
if (r) {
|
||||
DMERR("begin_hints failed");
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return policy_walk_mappings(policy, save_hint, cmd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int dm_cache_write_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&cmd->root_lock);
|
||||
r = save_hint(cmd, cblock, hint);
|
||||
r = write_hints(cmd, policy);
|
||||
up_write(&cmd->root_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
@ -128,14 +128,7 @@ void dm_cache_dump(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd);
|
||||
* rather than querying the policy for each cblock, we let it walk its data
|
||||
* structures and fill in the hints in whatever order it wishes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
int dm_cache_begin_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *p);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* requests hints for every cblock and stores in the metadata device.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int dm_cache_save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd,
|
||||
dm_cblock_t cblock, uint32_t hint);
|
||||
int dm_cache_write_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *p);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Query method. Are all the blocks in the cache clean?
|
||||
|
@ -2582,30 +2582,6 @@ static int write_discard_bitset(struct cache *cache)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int save_hint(void *context, dm_cblock_t cblock, dm_oblock_t oblock,
|
||||
uint32_t hint)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cache *cache = context;
|
||||
return dm_cache_save_hint(cache->cmd, cblock, hint);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int write_hints(struct cache *cache)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
r = dm_cache_begin_hints(cache->cmd, cache->policy);
|
||||
if (r) {
|
||||
DMERR("dm_cache_begin_hints failed");
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = policy_walk_mappings(cache->policy, save_hint, cache);
|
||||
if (r)
|
||||
DMERR("policy_walk_mappings failed");
|
||||
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* returns true on success
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -2623,7 +2599,7 @@ static bool sync_metadata(struct cache *cache)
|
||||
|
||||
save_stats(cache);
|
||||
|
||||
r3 = write_hints(cache);
|
||||
r3 = dm_cache_write_hints(cache->cmd, cache->policy);
|
||||
if (r3)
|
||||
DMERR("could not write hints");
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3094,7 +3070,7 @@ static void cache_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
|
||||
|
||||
static struct target_type cache_target = {
|
||||
.name = "cache",
|
||||
.version = {1, 3, 0},
|
||||
.version = {1, 4, 0},
|
||||
.module = THIS_MODULE,
|
||||
.ctr = cache_ctr,
|
||||
.dtr = cache_dtr,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user